Article citationsMore>>

Shryock, H. (1936). The Development of Modern Medicine. An Interpretation of the Social and Scientific Factors Involved. University of Pennsylvania Press.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: A Comparison between Homeopathy and the Foundations of Contemporary Scientific Theories

  AUTHORS: Antonino Drago, Sergio Maradei

  KEYWORDS: Hahnemann’s Writings, Homeopathy, Doubly Negated Propositions, Intuitionist Logic, Ad absurdum Arguments, Problem-Oriented Theoretical Organization

  JOURNAL NAME: Advances in Historical Studies, Vol.15 No.2, June 12, 2026

  ABSTRACT: The present paper analyses the epistemological status of the theory of homeopathy in the framework of the main scientific theories of its time. First of all, Hahnemann underlined its experimental nature in opposition to an abstract, rationalist medicines suggested by some his contemporaries. Moreover, recent studies on the foundations of logic enabled to recognize in the original texts of some non-Newtonian scientific theories of Hahnemann’s time the occurrences of doubly negated propositions pertaining to non-classical logic. Hahnemann’s writings are scrutinized according to this characteristic feature. A more accurate interpretation of Hahnemann’s thinking results. In particular the entire organization of his theory emerged as that of the non-Newtonian ones. His method of cure is enlightened under a new viewpoint. Some critical suggestions on the uncertain epistemological status of homeopathy are added.