TITLE:
Dislocation of Meaning: When Psychology Becomes an Oppression—War Rape Survivors Syndrome (WRSS)
AUTHORS:
Wioletta Rebecka
KEYWORDS:
War Rape, Dislocation of Meaning, Trauma, War Rape Survivors Syndrome (WRSS), Decolonial Psychology, Epistemic Violence, Transgenerational Trauma, Feminist Trauma Theory, Witnessing, Militarized Sexual Violence, Clinical Practice, Patriarchal Structures, Genocide, Narrative Foreclosure
JOURNAL NAME:
Psychology,
Vol.17 No.1,
January
14,
2026
ABSTRACT: This article examines the dislocation of meaning that occurs when the trauma of war rape is severed from its political, historical, and communal origins and reinterpreted through the individualizing, medicalized lens of Western psychology. Drawing on psychoanalytic theory, feminist trauma studies, decolonial epistemologies, and decades of clinical experience with survivors of conflict-related sexual violence, the article introduces War Rape Survivors Syndrome (WRSS), a conceptual framework developed to address the limitations of conventional psychiatric models—particularly Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)—in capturing the lived, embodied, and intergenerational consequences of genocidal rape. WRSS challenges the epistemic violence of pathologizing survivor responses while ignoring militarized, patriarchal, and colonial structures that weaponize women’s bodies and silence their testimonies. The article begins by interrogating the psychological erasure produced when survivors are compelled to translate their suffering into Eurocentric diagnostic codes. It then situates WRSS within a wide theoretical lineage, including Ferenczi, Herman, Laub, Hirsch, Erikson, Danieli, Fanon, Spivak, and Indigenous healing systems. A detailed description of the defining features of WRSS follows, encompassing fragmented memory, embodied shame, collapse of bodily boundaries, narrative foreclosure, attachment rupture, and transgenerational transmission. The clinical and psychotherapeutic implications of WRSS are then explored, with an emphasis on decolonial practice, radical safety, body-based healing, and culturally grounded witnessing. Finally, the article argues for an integrated medical, legal, psychological, and social response to WRSS, conceptualizing it not as a pathology but as a political indictment and a call to ethical solidarity.