Article citationsMore>>

Sagüés, N.P. and Cruz, G.E. (2008) Constitutional Procedural Law: Achievements and Obstacles; Reflections on the Challenges and Codification of Constitutional Procedural Law, the Boundaries of Constitutional Review and the Advances of Amparo. Constitutional Court of Peru, Center for Constitutional Studies.
https://www.tc.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/derecho_procconstitucional.pdf

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Constitutional Review in the Face of Defective Notifications: Reasonableness and Limits of Amparo and Habeas Corpus Proceedings

  AUTHORS: Lwanna Shanty Correa Bardales, Celeste Rosa Saldaña Vargas, Dayana Roxe Rivas Julca, Andrea Úrsula Torres Yachachin, Kassandra Belen Pachas Pelayo, Astrith Nayeli Chaupis Lizano, Isabel Tercera Gonzales Marino

  KEYWORDS: Defective Notification, Amparo, Habeas Corpus, Effective Judicial Protection, Due Process

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Access Library Journal, Vol.12 No.12, December 23, 2025

  ABSTRACT: This article examines the constitutional control of defective notifications and their impact on the limits of amparo and habeas corpus in Peru. It analyzes how procedural defects may violate the right to due process when they cause real and tangible harm, as well as the criteria established by the Constitutional Court to assess their constitutional significance. It argues that judicial intervention in these constitutional remedies must remain within reasonable limits, establishing clear restrictions for their filing to avoid overloading the Constitutional Court while ensuring effective procedural communication without compromising the efficiency of the judicial system.