Article citationsMore>>

Liu, H., Lan, L., Abrigo, J., Ip, H.L., Soo, Y., Zheng, D., et al. (2021) Comparison of Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Fluid Models in Blood Flow Simulation in Patients with Intracranial Arterial Stenosis. Frontiers in Physiology, 12, Article 718540.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.718540

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Pulsatile Flow Hemodynamics in a Stenosed Artery for Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Rheological Models

  AUTHORS: Md. Jashim Uddin

  KEYWORDS: Pulsatile Flow, Stenosis, Hemodynamics, Recirculation, Non-Newtonian Rheological Model

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Modelling and Simulation, Vol.13 No.4, August 29, 2025

  ABSTRACT: Atheromatous disease can cause a heart attack or stroke in humans. This present research aims to investigate the comparison between Newtonian and rheological models in terms of hemodynamic risk factors. A three-dimensional computational model has been considered here for 45%, 60%, and 75% stenoses. The COMSOL Multiphysics software has been used in fluid flow simulation to solve the governing equations. The comparison between Newtonian and non-Newtonian has been performed to predict the model’s suitability. Hemodynamic parameters such as time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shearing index, and blood residence time show a lower disturbed flow regime for non-Newtonian fluid compared to Newtonian fluid. The TAWSS for 75% stenosis is increased by 54.84% and 37.18% to those of 45% and 60% stenoses. A suitable non-Newtonian model can be used in bioengineering fields.