Article citationsMore>>

Wickramasinghe, S., Han, B., Zimbron, J., Shen, Z. and Karim, M. (2004) Arsenic Removal by Coagulation and Filtration: Comparison of Groundwaters from the United States and Bangladesh. Desalination, 169, 231-244.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-9164(04)00530-2

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Evaluation of pH Adjustment Chemical for Arsenic-Fluoride Removal Using Activated Alumina

  AUTHORS: Shubhashini Oza, Kayla Bauhs, Giridhar Upadhyaya, Joey Romo, Sandy A. Smith, Brian Hamrick, Katherine Y. Bell

  KEYWORDS: Arsenic, Fluoride, Activated Alumina, pH Adjustment, Carbon Dioxide, Adsorption

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Environmental Protection, Vol.16 No.6, June 27, 2025

  ABSTRACT: Arsenic and fluoride are co-existing contaminants commonly found in groundwater used for drinking water supply and often exceeding drinking water maximum contaminant levels of 10 µg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively. Adsorption and coagulation followed by filtration are technologies used for treatment. The USA-EPA has identified alumina adsorption as the best available technology. While arsenic removal with activated alumina was not pH-dependent in this study, fluoride removal was pH dependent, with an optimal range between 5.0 - 6.0. A bench study was conducted comparing sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and carbon dioxide as alternatives for pH adjustment. While arsenic and fluoride removal were independent of chemicals used for pH adjustment, the costs of pH adjustment with carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid were similar for the site considered, indicating that carbon dioxide can be a safer and better alternative for pH adjustment if a carbon dioxide generating facility is closer to treatment site.