TITLE:
MLP, XGBoost, KAN, TDNN, and LSTM-GRU Hybrid RNN with Attention for SPX & NDX European Call Option Pricing
AUTHORS:
Boris Ter-Avanesov, Homayoon Beigi
KEYWORDS:
European Call Option, Moneyness, Time-Delay Neural Network (TDNN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN)
JOURNAL NAME:
Journal of Mathematical Finance,
Vol.15 No.2,
May
30,
2025
ABSTRACT: We explore the performance of various artificial neural network architectures, including a multilayer perceptron (MLP), Kolmogorov-Arnold network (KAN), LSTM-GRU hybrid recursive neural network (RNN) models, and a time-delay neural network (TDNN) for pricing European call options. In this study, we attempt to leverage the ability of supervised learning methods, such as ANNs, KANs, and gradient-boosted decision trees, to approximate complex multivariate functions in order to calibrate option prices based on past market data. The motivation for using ANNs and KANs is the Universal Approximation Theorem and Kolmogorov-Arnold Representation Theorem, respectively. Specifically, we use S&P 500 (SPX) and NASDAQ 100 (NDX) index options traded during 2015-2023 with times to maturity ranging from 15 days to over 4 years (OptionMetrics IvyDB US dataset). Black & Scholes’s (BS) PDE [1] model’s performance in pricing the same options compared to real data is used as a benchmark. This model relies on strong assumptions, and it has been observed and discussed in the literature that real data does not match its predictions. Supervised learning methods are widely used as an alternative for calibrating option prices due to some of the limitations of this model. In our experiments, the BS model underperforms compared to all of the others. Also, the best MLP model outperforms the best TDNN model on all error metrics. We implement a simple self-attention mechanism to enhance the RNN models, significantly improving their performance. The best-performing model overall is the LSTM-GRU hybrid RNN model with attention. Also, the KAN model outperforms the TDNN and MLP models. We analyze the performance of all models by ticker, moneyness category, and over/under/correctly-priced percentage.