Article citationsMore>>

Davis, K. T., Robles, M. D., Kemp, K. B., Higuera, P. E., Chapman, T., Metlen, K. L. et al. (2023). Reduced Fire Severity Offers Near-Term Buffer to Climate-Driven Declines in Conifer Resilience across the Western United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120, e2208120120.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208120120

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Is Forestation Still Good Climate Policy Despite Increasing Forest Fires?

  AUTHORS: William R. Cline

  KEYWORDS: Climate Change, Forest Fires, Carbon Sequestration

  JOURNAL NAME: American Journal of Climate Change, Vol.14 No.2, May 16, 2025

  ABSTRACT: Despite the global increase in forest fires in recent years, forestation—the planting of trees in new areas (afforestation) and previously deforested areas (reforestation)—remains a major and relatively low-cost approach for sequestering carbon dioxide. High-resolution satellite data show that the annual incidence of tree death and corresponding carbon dioxide release from stand-replacement forest fires remains low. The analysis applies this incidence as a “hazard rate” in the actuarial sense and arrives at cumulative probabilities of the burning of newly planted trees over time. Even with projected increases in response to global warming, this hazard rate would not reach levels that would substantially negate sequestration gains from forestation. Estimates based on past US experience further suggest that health, property, and other damages from forestation’s addition of potential forest area fuel to burn would be much smaller than the benefit from the additional carbon sequestration resulting from the forestation.