TITLE:
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Following Cryotherapy, Thermal Ablation, and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for Cervical Treatments among Reproductive Age Women in Zambia
AUTHORS:
Victoria Mwiinga-Kalusopa, Johanna E. Maree, Concepta Kwaleyela, Emmanuel Mwila Musenge, Marie-Claire Uwamahoro, Patricia Katowa-Mukwato
KEYWORDS:
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes, Cervical Treatment, Cryotherapy, Thermal Ablation, Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure, Reproductive Age Women, Zambia
JOURNAL NAME:
Health,
Vol.16 No.11,
November
28,
2024
ABSTRACT: Background: Cervical Intraepithelial neoplasia treatments have become essential interventions to manage cervical lesions. Most recipients are women of reproductive age who, as reported in the literature, may be at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study investigated the risk of abortions, prematurity, stillbirths, and prolonged labor among reproductive-age women following Cryotherapy, Thermal ablation, and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure treatments in Zambia. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed records of 8000 women aged 15 - 49 years at the Adult Infectious Disease Control Centre using records between January 2010 and December 2020. Women constituting the treatment group were all respondents treated by cryotherapy, thermal ablation, and LEEP, while the control group were VIA negative women. Women from both groups were invited to answer a phone survey. Data were analyzed using Stata version 16; descriptive analysis estimated the prevalence and obtained the frequency distribution of abortion, prematurity, prolonged labor and fresh stillbiths. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test established the associations of CIN and APOs at 95% Confidence intervals. Univariate and multivariable binary logistic regression estimated the odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes across the three treatments. Results: Adverse pregnancy outcomes were more prevalent in the treatment group (39.2%) compared to the untreated group (16.9%). Across the two groups, normal outcomes were lower in the treated (42.3% vs 57.7%). The treated group accounted for the majority of abortions (74.5% vs 25.5%) and prolonged labor (72.5% vs 27.5%), while the untreated group accounted for higher proportions of stillbirths (66.7% vs 33.3%) and prematurity (53% vs 47%). Adverse pregnancy outcomes were five and two times more likely in women treated with thermal ablation (aOR = 5.05, 95% CI = 4.01 - 6.36, p Conclusion: Cervical treatment among Zambian women increases the risk of abortion and prolongs labor. Therefore, caution should be taken when administered to those of reproductive age. Vigilant monitoring should be maintained during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum to improve maternal and neonatal health.