TITLE:
Building the Capacity of Health Professionals in Monitoring and Evaluation in a Public Health Institution: Experience of the National Institute of Public Health (NIPH) of Côte d’Ivoire
AUTHORS:
Esme Marie Laure Essis, N’guetta Mathilde Manouan, Anna-Corine Estell Liema Bissouma, Ethmonia Kouamé, Ekissi Orsot Tetchi, Sagou Olivier Yayo, Stephane Claon, Yao Eugene Konan, William Yavo, Agbaya Stephane Oga, Tenenan Jean Marie Yeo, Joseph Aka
KEYWORDS:
Short-Term Training, Capacity Building, Monitoring and Evaluation, Health Professional, Africa, Côte d’Ivoire
JOURNAL NAME:
Health,
Vol.16 No.8,
August
23,
2024
ABSTRACT: Background: In the context of the fight against HIV, a lack of skills in monitoring and evaluating the personnel in charge of activities has been identified at the national level. It was the subject of a priority axis of the national plan for monitoring and evaluating the fight against HIV (2006-2010) that was aimed at strengthening the capacities of actors in this area. To increase the critical mass of competent human resources in the short term, the National Institute of Public Health (NIPH) of Côte d’Ivoire organized monitoring and evaluation training sessions for healthcare professionals from 2011 to 2016. Methods: A single case study with multiple levels of analysis was carried out, combining a qualitative survey and a literature review. An evaluation was carried out six months after each training session. In addition, the results of the pre- and post-tests and of the daily and final evaluations that accompanied the various training sessions were used to provide further information. The qualitative data collected were analyzed using INVIVO 15 software. Results: Some 89 health professionals (69% men and 31% women) working at the national level (51% at the central level, including 58% in health programs) and in development partner agencies (37%) participated in this capacity building program. Most participants were senior health managers (56%), data managers (23%), and statisticians and computer scientists (10%). Almost all the trainings were financed by 16 technical and financial partners (85%), mainly the MEASURE Evaluation project (27%). Conclusion: M&E training, despite all its imperfections, has made it possible to identify M&E training needs at the national level and to increase the critical mass of national skills and to have some culture in M&E.