Article citationsMore>>

Joshi, B.K., Vista, S.P., Gurung, S.B., Ghimire, K.H., Gurung, R., Pant, S., Gautam, S., and Paneru, P.B. (2020) Cultivar Mixture for Minimizing Risk in Farming and Conserving Agrobiodiversity. In: Gauchan, D., Joshi, B.K., Bhandari, B., Manandhar, H.K. and Jarvis, D.I. (eds.), Traditional Crop Biodiversity for Mountain Food and Nutrition Security in Nepal: Tools and Research Results of the UNEP GEF Local Crop Project, The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, NAGRC and LI-BIRD, Kathmandu, Nepal, 14-24.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Characterization of Small-Scale Farmers and Assessment of Their Access to Crop Production Information in Selected Counties of Kenya

  AUTHORS: Anastasia Mumbi Wahome, John B. K. Kiema, Galcano C. Mulaku, Isaac Mukoko

  KEYWORDS: Small Scale Farmers, Farmers, Crop Production, Information Services, Geospatial Information, Information Access

  JOURNAL NAME: Agricultural Sciences, Vol.15 No.5, May 31, 2024

  ABSTRACT: Small-scale farming accounts for 78% of total agricultural production in Kenya and contributes to 23.5% of the country’s GDP. Their crop production activities are mostly rainfed subsistence with any surplus being sold to bring in some income. Timely decisions on farm practices such as farm preparation and planting are critical determinants of the seasonal outcomes. In Kenya, most small-scale farmers have no reliable source of information that would help them make timely and accurate decisions. County governments have extension officers who are mandated with giving farmers advisory services to farmers but they are not able to reach most farmers due to facilitation constraints. The mode and format of sharing information is also critical since it’s important to ensure that it’s timely, well-understood and usable. This study sought to assess access to geospatial derived and other crop production information by farmers in four selected counties of Kenya. Specific objectives were to determine the profile of small-scale farmers in terms of age, education and farm size; to determine the type of information that is made available to them by County and Sub-County extension officers including the format and mode of provision; and to determine if the information provided was useful in terms of accuracy, timeliness and adequacy. The results indicated that over 80% of the farmers were over 35 years of age and over 56% were male. Majority had attained primary education (34%) or secondary education (29%) and most farmers in all the counties grew maize (71%). Notably, fellow farmers were a source of information (71%) with the frequency of sharing information being mostly seasonal (37%) and when information was available (43%). Over 66% of interviewed farmers indicating that they faced challenges while using provided information. The results from the study are insightful and helpful in determining effective ways of providing farmers with useful information to ensure maximum benefits.