Article citationsMore>>

Kessous, R., Weintraub, A.Y., Wiznitzer, A., Zlotnik, A., Pariente, G., Polachek, H., Press, F., Aricha-Tamir, B., Leizerovich, A. and Sheiner, E. (2012) Spinal versus General Anesthesia in Cesarean Sections: The Effects on Postoperative Pain Perception. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 286, 75-79.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2265-y

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Obstetric Anesthesia Practice Significantly Evolved: A Field for Cesarean Delivery Parturient for the Provision of Safe Anesthesia in Urgent Circumstances

  AUTHORS: Mustafa Zakaria, Amal Haoudar, Said Makani, Mariame Kabbour, Oumaima Taoussi, Karim Elaidaoui, Yousra Rajaa, Chafik El Kettani, Adil Elghanmi

  KEYWORDS: General Anesthesia, Cesarean Delivery, Intubation, Maternal Refusal, Obstetric Anesthetists

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol.14 No.3, March 27, 2024

  ABSTRACT: General anesthesia and Obstetric Anesthesia is the gold standard for a cesarean section but there are some cases where general anesthesia is unavoidable. The use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery has decreased in recent years due to the widespread use of neuraxial techniques. The choice of anesthesia techniques for cesarean delivery depends on several factors, including the patient’s psychology and the attending physician’s experience. It is chosen because of its safety profile and its benefits to the mother and fetus. It may be indicated due to emergency, maternal refusal of regional techniques, or regional contraindications. Major complications include failed intubation, gastric content aspiration, and increased bleeding risk. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a newly launched team on obstetric anesthesia practice.