Article citationsMore>>

Pau, H.W., Leitner, H. and Hartwein, J. (1991) Bohrer-Berührung des Trommelfells mit bei Ohroperationen: Möglichkeit der Innenohrschädigung? In: Fleischer, K. and Kleinsasser, O., Eds., Teil II: Sitzungsbericht. Verhandlungsbericht der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf-und Hals-Chirurgie, Vol. 1991/2, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 297-300.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84592-5_251

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Effects of Drilling in Mastoid Cavity over Hearing in the Contralateral Ear

  AUTHORS: Saumyata Neeraj

  KEYWORDS: Mastoid Drilling, Affected Hearing, Contralateral Ear Damage

  JOURNAL NAME: International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Vol.13 No.2, March 11, 2024

  ABSTRACT: In advanced otological surgeries, powered instruments form an indispensable part. The risk of deterioration to hearing in the operated ear is a commonly discussed issue, however, there remains a possibility of affecting the hearing in the contralateral ear due to transcranial vibration. So in this study we aimed to assess the possibility of the non-operated ear being affected by the noise generated during ear surgeries and whether it is temporary or permanent in nature. Methodology: This study included 63 patients diagnosed with unilateral disease who underwent mastoid surgery. Preoperatively all the patients were subjected to Pure tone audiometry (PTA), Transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE). Patients were operated using both cutting and diamond burrs of ranging from sizes 1 - 6 mm. Total drilling time was recorded. Results: Post-operative hearing evaluation was done at 1 week, 4 weeks and 12 weeks. The sound emitted by various burrs was recorded by Sound Level Meter. Out of the total 58 patients that followed up, 46 showed change in at least one of the hearing parameters. Patients showing changes had a higher drilling time as compared to those with no changes. Of these, the changes associated with the total drilling time and with cutting burr time were found to be significant. The hearing changes seen on PTA, TEOAE and DPOAE were transient in nature with only one patient having a persistent decreased high frequency threshold at the end of 12 weeks. It was also found that cutting burrs produce more sound as compared to diamond burrs and a larger size burr of a type produces more sound than a smaller one of its type. Conclusion: The drilling of mastoid bone during ear surgeries can transiently impair the hearing in the contralateral ear which is of great significance in patients with only one hearing ear.