TITLE:
Decision Support System in Determination Risk Management System Model in State Universities Public Service Agency —Case Study at the Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
AUTHORS:
Sutoyo , Agus Santosa, Gita Astyka Rahmanda, Muhammad Aziz Eko
KEYWORDS:
SU PSA, Risk, Risk Management, Risk Management Process, Risk Management Structure, Risk Management Procedures
JOURNAL NAME:
Journal of Financial Risk Management,
Vol.13 No.1,
February
19,
2024
ABSTRACT: This research would discuss as well as showcase a
design of a risk management system that are applicable to State University
Public Service Agency (SU PSA or PTN BLU) (Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Layanan Umum/PTN BLU) with a case study at the Universitas
Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta (UPNYK). This study would utilize a
descriptive qualitative method alongside a case study at UPNYK. With using interviews
and documentation as the data collection method, the research that would
interpret and analyze a more appropriate design of risk management system that
should be implemented by UPNYK. Data was analyzed with a method of: data
collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion verification. The
study reveals that risk management at UPNYK was found operational, although it
has yet to be delivered in a comprehensive and methodical manner. Therefore,
UPNYK needs to establish a sound and comprehensive risk management system which
encompasses its organizational elements, functions, and methods. One of the
implementation of risk management would be using a control model of three level
stratification, in which Audit Committee (AC or KA) would be responsible
for the policy level, a Chancellor with assistance from the Internal Monitoring
Unit (Satuan Pengawas Intern/SPI)
that would coordinate the operational level, and the Quality Assurance
Committee (QAC or KJM) functions as the organizer for the work unit’s efforts. Using this
system, the Audit Committee would be in charge on supervising the
implementation of the system. The process would be done in accordance with the
Australian New Zealand International Standard (AS/NZS ISO) 31,000:2009 standards which
consist of the process of establishing context, risk identification, risk
analysis, risk evaluation, risk handling, review, communication, and
consultation. Risk management processes will be compiled with respect to the
UPNYK’s objective period which may consist of a five and one year period as
well a specific time period.