TITLE:
Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TRUP) for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in Central Cote D’Ivoire: Indications and Results
AUTHORS:
Kouassi Patrice Avion, N’diamoi Akassimadou, Venance Alloka, Sadia Kamara, Koffi Dje
KEYWORDS:
BPH, TURP, Endo-Urology, Prostate
JOURNAL NAME:
Open Journal of Urology,
Vol.14 No.2,
February
4,
2024
ABSTRACT: Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is defined histologically as adenomyofromatous hyperplasia of the transitional zone of the prostate. It remains the most common benign tumour in men over the age of 50, and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the surgical treatment of choice. Objectives: To determine the indications and present our results of transurethral resection of the prostate. Patients and Methods: After obtaining approval from the ethics committee of the private hospital and the university hospital of Bouaké (Côte d’Ivoire), we conducted a cross-sectional study of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) between January 2021 and April 2023. All patients and their families were informed beforehand and had signed an informed consent form. All patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with ultrasound weight of less than 80 grams were included. The following parameters were studied: age, reason for consultation, ultrasound prostate weight of benign prostatic hyperplasia, indication for TURP, duration of operation, blood loss, duration of post-PRT urinary drainage, length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality, and outcome. Results: 39 patients with a mean age of 58.3 years (57-77 years) underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). TURP was indicated in 46.15% (n = 18) of cases of refractory acute urinary retention with failure of the urinary catheter removal test, 17.94% (n = 7) of cases of lower urinary tract disorders that were incapacitating despite treatment, 15.38% (n = 6) of cases of refractory or recurrent urinary tract infection, 10.25% (n = 4) of cases of failure of medical treatment and 10.25% (n = 4) of cases of iterative hematuria. The mean duration of TURP was 53.68 min (48-57), the mean weight of the resected prostate was 58.7 g (35 and 83 g), blood loss was minimal in 92.30% (n = 36), the mean duration of irrigation-washing was 2. 5 days (1-3 days), the mean time for urinary catheterisation was 2.45 days (3 and 4 days), 5.12% (n = 2) of patients presented complications such as hemorrhage compensated by a blood transfusion. One patient developed orchiepididymitis (2.56%). The average hospital stay was 3.75 days (3-5 days). Pathological examination was in favour of BPH in 92.3% (n = 36) and the coexistence of BPH and prostate adenocarcinoma in 7.69% (n = 3). The results of TURP were considered good in 94.87% (n = 37). Mortality was nil. Conclusion: In view of our results, TURP is a reliable, elegant minimally invasive technique with low morbidity and mortality.