Article citationsMore>>

Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social Dominance Orientation, Anti-Egalitarianism and the Political Psychology of Gender: An Extension and Cross-Cultural Replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41-67.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200001/02)30:1<41::AID-EJSP976>3.0.CO;2-O

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Moral Considerations in Political Decision-Making: Differences by Political Orientation and Gender

  AUTHORS: Christina M. Frederick, Shawn Doherty

  KEYWORDS: Decision-Making, Political Orientation, Gender

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.11 No.9, September 18, 2023

  ABSTRACT: There may be many factors determining the moral dimensions used by individuals when making political decisions. Two important dimensions worthy of examination are political orientation and gender. Based on Moral Foundation Theory (Graham et al., 2009), the present study examined how both of the aforementioned factors influence the moral dimensions used in political decisions. Participants (n = 338) completed a demographic survey, rated their self-perceived political orientation and then completed the Moral Relevance Scale (Graham, Haidt, & Nosek, 2009) and the Ideological Consistency Scale (Pew Research Center, 2014), which was used to place participants in liberal, moderate or conservative political orientation groups. A MANOVA showed no differences in participants based on gender, but significant differences in decision-making based on political ideology. Discussion focused on how moderates differ in their views from other ideologies, a relatively new finding.