Article citationsMore>>

Tsushima, Y., Ishiguchi, T., Murakami, T., Hayashi, H., Hayakawa, K., Fukuda, K., Korogi, Y., Sugimoto, H., Takehara, Y., Narumi, Y., Arai, Y., Kuwatsuru, R., Yoshimitsu, K., Awai, K., Kanematsu, M. and Takagi, R. (2016) Safe Use of Iodinated and Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media in Current Practice in Japan: A Questionnaire Survey. Japanese Journal of Radiology, 34, 130-139.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0505-3

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Protective Effect of Oral Steroid Premedication: Adverse Reactions to Nonionic Iodine Contrast Media for Computed Tomography

  AUTHORS: Norikazu Koori, Akiko Maeda, Mayumi Yasui, Hiroki Kamekawa, Yusuke Yoshida, Akari Noda, Yuta Shiraki, Kazuya Yokoi, Yudai Suzuki, Kazuma Kurata, Hiroko Nishikawa

  KEYWORDS: Iodine Contrast Media, Oral Steroid Premedication, Breakthrough Reaction, Prednisolone, Adverse Reactions

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Radiology, Vol.12 No.3, September 27, 2022

  ABSTRACT: This study aimed to investigate the protective effect of oral steroid premedication in terms of adverse reactions to non-ionic contrast media. We investigated the incidence of adverse reactions among patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Patients in the premedication group took 30 mg of prednisolone orally the night before and on the morning of the scheduled computed tomography. Sixty-five patients received the same contrast media. Among them, 56 took prednisolone orally prior to the procedure (premedication without change of contrast media group) and nine without premedication (no premedication and no change of contrast media group). In total, 379 patients received different contrast media. Among them, 340 took prednisolone orally (premedication with change of contrast media group), while 39 did not take the premedication (no premedication with change of contrast media group). The adverse reaction rates in the premedication with change of contrast media and no premedication with change of contrast media groups were 1.8% (6/340 cases) and 2.6% (1/39 cases) (P = 0.54), respectively. The incidence of adverse reaction after the administration of non-ionic iodinated contrast media did not differ significantly based on whether an oral steroid was administered prior to compute tomography. Our evaluation is limited due to the small sample size of the contrast media-changed group. However, even if premedication with steroids is effective, it may only result in an adverse reaction reduction rate of ≤3%.