Article citationsMore>>

Khumaidah et al., (2014) Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 100/Puu-X/2012 Atas Permohonan Uji Materiil Pasal 96 Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan Terkait Daluwarsa Penuntutan Pembayaran Upah Pekerja [Juridical Implication on the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 100/Puu-X/2012 for the Application of Material Examination on Article 96 of the Manpower Law Related to the Statute of Limitation for the Pretention of Employees’ Wage Payment]. Faculty of Law, Univesity of Brawijaya.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Unfair Practice of Statute of Limitation in the Court of Industrial Relation

  AUTHORS: Salahudin Gaffar, Agus Karsona, Indra Perwira, Yani Pujiwati

  KEYWORDS: Statute of Limitations, Employment Termination, Industrial Dispute Settlement, Court of Industrial Relations, Labor Law

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.10 No.5, May 6, 2022

  ABSTRACT: Article 171 of the Law No. 13/2003 j.o. Article 82 of Law No. 2/2004 primarily regulates 1 (one) year statute of limitations for the employees to submit an objection against their employment termination to the Court of Industrial Relations (“CIR”). Suppose they miss such chance; the rights will subsequently vanish. This research focuses on the statute of limitations to submit an objection against the employment termination through juridical-normative approach. The qualitative data is collected through secondary resources acquired by the author from the database published by the relevant institution to the public. The study results show that the court continues to accept and examine the cases despite this statute of limitations. Such a condition injures justice and results in legal uncertainty.