Article citationsMore>>

Prakken, H., & Vreeswijk, G. (2002). Logics for Defeasible Argumentation. In D. M. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic (Vol. 4, pp. 219-318). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Rationale and Approach of the Legal Expert System Construction

  AUTHORS: Caixia Zou, Fangchun Li, Yi’nan Dong

  KEYWORDS: Legal Expert System, Symbolism, Connectionism, Defeasible Reasoning

  JOURNAL NAME: Beijing Law Review, Vol.13 No.1, March 24, 2022

  ABSTRACT: Based on the interpretation on the evolution of theoretical basis of the construction of legal expert system as the clue, this article mainly analyzes and points out the dilemma faced by symbolism and connectionism as the algorithm on construction of legal expert system. Through defeasible reasoning, a contextual-based legal expert system could be realized. The legal expert system should be constructed with the judge as the center character, in which the personality of the judge could not necessarily be eliminated. As a result, the article provides a model of a legal expert system based on dual processing, including factual argumentation and legal argumentation.