Article citationsMore>>

Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., Detweiler-Bedell, B., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (2001). Implications of attitude change theories for numerical anchoring: Anchor plausibility and the limits of anchor effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 62-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1431

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Erratum to “Influences on the Marking of Examinations” [Psychology 5 (2014) 91-98]

  AUTHORS: Christina Bermeitinger, Benjamin Unger

  KEYWORDS: Anchoring Effect; Marking; Feedback; Mood; Written Tests; Performance Judgments

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.13 No.1, January 19, 2022

  ABSTRACT: The original online version of this article (Bermeitinger, C., & Unger, B. (2014). Influences on the Marking of Examinations. Psychology, 5, 91-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.52014) unfortunately contains a mistake in Experiment 3. The data of one person were considered twice for the analysis. The authors wish to correct the errors.