Article citationsMore>>

Kwiat, P.G., Waks, E., White, A.G., Appelbaum, I. and Eberhard, P.H. (1999) Ultrabright Source of Polarization-Entangled Photons. Physical Review A, 60, 773-776.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.R773

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: What Do Bell-Tests Prove? A Detailed Critique of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Including Counterexamples

  AUTHORS: Karl Hess

  KEYWORDS: Bell Theorem, Clauser-Horne-Shimomy-Holt, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Modern Physics, Vol.12 No.9, July 9, 2021

  ABSTRACT: Many future directions of scientific endeavors depend on quantum theory and the precise interpretation and significance of the entanglement of quantum-particles. This interpretation depends in turn on the physical meaning of so called Bell-tests that are mostly performed using entangled photons and randomly switched polarizers to measure their polarization at distant locations. This paper presents a detailed critique of the well known theory of Bell tests given by Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH). It is demonstrated that several important steps of the CHSH derivations contain serious inaccuracies of the underlying physics and probability theory and even a calculus error. As a consequence, the Bell-CHSH theory cannot be used to demonstrate extreme and opposite interpretations of entanglement such as super-luminal influences or alternatively super-determinism that cast aspersions on Einstein’s concepts of locality and separability.