Article citationsMore>>

Mark, L.J., Herzer, K.R., Cover, R., Pandian, V., Bhatti, N.I., Berkow, L.C., Haut, E.R., Hillel, A.T., Miller, C.R., Feller-Kopman, D.J., Schiavi, A.J., Xie, Y.J., Lim, C., Holzmueller, C., Ahmad, M., Thomas, P., Flint, P.W. and Mirski, M.A. (2015) Difficult Airway Response Team: A Novel Quality Improvement Program for Managing Hospital-Wide Airway Emergencies. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 121, 127-139.
https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000691

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: An Audit of the Emergency Airway Service in a Regional Hospital in Singapore

  AUTHORS: Sheng Chuu Anne Kiew, Hui Xin Marilyn Ng, Kelvin How Yow Quek, Jinxi Zheng, Joanne Yeo

  KEYWORDS: Difficult Airway, Emergency Endotracheal Intubation, Airway Response Team, Airway Service

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol.11 No.7, July 9, 2021

  ABSTRACT: Background: Emergency endotracheal intubations (EEI) performed outside of operating theatre (OT) tend to be more challenging and associated with higher risk of complications. In 2011, with the objective of improving patient outcomes, we set up an Emergency Airway Service (EAS) at our 1000-bed regional hospital, with the aim of providing specialized assistance for outside of OT difficult airway management. Method: A retrospective audit of EAS activation from 12/9/2016 and 27/10/2020 was conducted. EAS forms and electronic medical records were reviewed. We collected information on patient characteristics, EAS activation characteristics and its outcomes. Descriptive analysis method was used to present the collected data. Results: There were a total of 275 activations, of which 268 were analysed. Reasons for activation were anticipated difficult intubation (42.2% n = 113), failed intubation attempt (52.6%, n = 141) and advanced intubation equipment required (5.2% n = 14). Intubation was attempted in 261/268 (97.4%) cases by the EAS team. Of these, 255 (97.7%) cases were successful while 6 (2.3%) cases failed intubation. Of the successful intubations by the EAS team, 208/255 (81.5%) were successful on the first attempt. Out of the 6 unsuccessful intubation cases, 1 case required a rescue cricothyroidotomy and 4 cases required an open tracheostomy. Intubation was deemed easy by the EAS team in 170/261 (65.1%) cases. 64/170 (37.6%) cases were intubated with a video laryngoscope (VL). There were 85 cases (32.3%) classified as difficult intubation by the EAS specialist, 13/85 (15.3%) were intubated using only VL, 54/85 (63.5%) cases were intubated using VL with style/bougie. Conclusion: Audit results showed that providing an experienced and well-equipped team of airway specialists round-the-clock to assist in difficult and potentially difficult endotracheal intubations is justifiable and may reduce complications associated with EEI.