Article citationsMore>>

Dee, D.P., Uppala, S.M., Simmons, A.J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M.A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A.C.M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A.J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S.B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E.V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A.P., Monge-Sanz, B.M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N. and Vitart, F. (2011) The ERA-Interim Reanalysis: Configuration and Performance of the Data Assimilation System. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137, 553-597.
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Assessing the Skills of Rossby Centre Regional Climate Model in Simulating Observed Rainfall over Rwanda

  AUTHORS: Janet Umuhoza, Lin Chen, Lucia Mumo

  KEYWORDS: CORDEX, RCA4, Rainfall, Rwanda, Simulation Bias

  JOURNAL NAME: Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, Vol.11 No.3, May 31, 2021

  ABSTRACT: Rainfall over Rwanda is highly variable both in space and time. This variability leads to chronic food insecurity due to the overdependence of the economy on rain-fed agriculture systems. This study aims to evaluate the skills of Rossby Centre Regional Climate Model (RCA4) simulations driven by 10 GCMs for the period 1951-2005 using the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC v8) as a reference. Different statistical and geospatial metrics were used to deduce the model’s skills in simulating seasonal and annual rainfall. Results show that the country received bimodal rainfall pattern; March-May (MAM) and September-December (SOND). The RCA4 models are inconsistent in simulating the MAM rainy peak. However, the models are coherent in simulating SOND seasonal peak despite exhibiting wet bias. The models show reasonable skills in simulating mean annual cycle than interannual variability as depicted by insignificant correlation and different signs of rainfall trend. Conclusively, the performance of RCA4 models in simulating observed rainfall characteristics over Rwanda is relatively weak. The performance of the models differs at various time scales. Nevertheless, the models can be ranked from the best performing to the least as; CSIRO, CanESM2, CNRM, GFDL, MIROC5, ENS, EC-Earth, HadGEM2, IPSL, MPI, and NorESM1. Ranking the performance of RCA4 historical models acts as a basis for future climate model’s selection depending on the purpose of the study. The findings of this study may help in devising appropriate climate adaptation measures to respond to the ongoing global warming for sustainable economic and livelihood development. Additionally, modelers may improve the model’s parametrization schemes and lessen the inherent chronic biases for a better presentation of the future.