Article citationsMore>>

Stefanoni, M., Casciola, L., Ceccarelli, G., Spaziani, A., Conti, D., Bartoli, A., Zitti, L.D., Bellocchi, R. and Valeri, R. (2006) The biliopancreatic diversion. A comparison of laparoscopic and laparotomic techniques. Minerva Chirurgica, 61, 205-213.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The opinion and experience of surgeons with laparoscopic bowel grasper haptics

  AUTHORS: Eleonora P. Westebring-van der Putten, Margriet C. J. Berben, Richard H. M. Goossens, Jack J. Jakimowicz, Jenny Dankelman

  KEYWORDS: Laparoscopy; Vision and Experience; Bowel Graspers; Questionnaire; Haptic Feedback

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Vol.3 No.4, April 28, 2010

  ABSTRACT: Background: In order to develop new and better laparoscopic bowel instruments, which reduces patient risks, the opinions and experience that surgeons have with current laparoscopic bowel grasper haptics is important. In this study we explored this by means of a questionnaire. Method: A total of 386 online- questionnaires, were sent to laparoscopic surgeons working in European hospitals. They were all members of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery and perform laparoscopic obesities or bowel surgery. Surgeons where divided into different age and experience groups. Results: A total of 174 completely filled out forms were analyzed. In total, 16% of the surgeons cannot prevent damage when they pinch too hard, although they (10%) might have seen or felt it. Seven percent of the respondents were not able to see or feel tissue slippage. Whereas 31% can see or feel slippage they cannot do anything to prevent it. Overall, most of the respondents would appreciate technical changes in the laparoscopic bowel graspers to reduce tissue damage. Of all the respondents, 79% maintain that it is necessary to have a new laparoscopic grasper with augmented feedback. The majority of the respondents (77%) would like to have tactile feedback as an indication of the level of pinch force. There are not many differences in the opinions of surgeons at different skill levels. Conclusion: From the results of the questionnaire and the other comments made by respondents it is evident that research and developments in the field of new laparoscopic graspers should continue.