Article citationsMore>>
Mahmud, I., Kelley, T., Stowell, C., Haripriya, A., Boman, A., Kossler, I., Morlet, N., Pershing, S., Pesudovs, K., Goh, P.P., Sparrow, J.M. and Lundström, M. (2015) A Proposed Minimum Standard Set of Outcome Measures for Cataract Surgery. JAMA Ophthalmology, 133, 1247-1252.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.2810
has been cited by the following article:
-
TITLE:
Cataract Surgery in Germany: Data from a German Registry on Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery in the Year 2018
AUTHORS:
Christian Schäferhoff, Jörg Förster, Bernd Schneider
KEYWORDS:
German Registry, Cataract Surgery, Visual Outcome, EUREQUO
JOURNAL NAME:
Open Journal of Ophthalmology,
Vol.10 No.4,
November
10,
2020
ABSTRACT: Background: The German registry for
cataract surgery was established in 2014. The main
aim of this registry was to improve cataract surgery outcomes. Aim: The
aim of this project is to offer a tool for benchmarking through the establishment of a reference database in Germany
where surgeons could record and analyze their own outcomes. Methods: Data
were collected between January 2018 and December 2018. The analyzed data
included parameters of surgical technique, implanted intraocular lens (IOL),
refractive and visual outcomes. Results: During the year of 2018, the
German registry included 10,035 lens exchange surgeries and the complete
follow-up was available for 9882 lens extractions. Approximately one third of
the patients were between 76 and 80 years old and 60.6% of the cases had a
best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) before surgery of 0.5 or better.
Parabulbar anesthesia was reported in 60.4% of the cases and
phacoemulsification with implantation of a posterior chamber IOL was the chosen
method in 92.2% of the cases. The power of the implanted IOL was between 21.0 - 22.9D in 29.4% of eyes. Surgical complications were
reported in only 413 cases. After surgery, a CDVA
of 0.5 or better was achieved in 90.8% of the cases. Most of the operated patients (64%) had a residual refractive error within ±0.5D (95% confidence
interval 63.2 - 65.1). Conclusions: Our results show that the registry was implementedsuccessfully with results comparable to the ones reported in EUREQUO.