Article citationsMore>>

Dohan Ehrenfest, D.M., Coelho, P.G., Kang, B.S., Sul, Y.T. and Albrektsson, T. (2010) Classification of Osseointegrated Implant Surfaces: Materials, Chemistry and Topography. Trends in Biotechnology, 28, 198-206.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: I Do Biotech Dental Implants: Prospective Multicentric Study after 5 Years of Functional Loading

  AUTHORS: J. F. Ballester Ferrandis, Song Jae Hyun, Kim Jong Yeon, Anaraki Mohaammad, Varun Goel, Shaker Tarawneh, Ming Yang, De Darabi Mohammadreza, Ysang Century, Tian Han Qing, S. J. Ballester Bon

  KEYWORDS: Dental Implants, Titanium, Morse Taper, SLA Surface, Multicentric Study, Peri-Implantitis, Prosthodontic Failures, Study after 5 Years of Loading, Quality of Life

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Stomatology, Vol.10 No.6, June 19, 2020

  ABSTRACT: Introduction: I Do Biotech’s implants were developed starting in 2014. Since then, they obtained GMP and KFDA licenses for distribution in 2015. The main objective of this paper is to determine the survival rate of I Do Biotech implants five years after the first surgery. Material and Methods: 1000 implants were used on 480 prostheses across 10 clinics on 320 healthy, non-smoker and non-diabetic patients, chosen at random, of which 160 are male and 160 female, all in the age range of 30 to 50 years old. The failure rate was studied related to the patient’s gender, the length and diameter of the implant, anatomical location, the percentage of peri-implantitis, prosthodontic failures and the patient’s quality of life. Discussion: The results obtained are similar to those of Van Steenberghe D. Dieter-Busenlechner, E. Serrano Catauria and far superior to those of Sáenz Guzmán. Failure rates vary greatly from study to study due to the heterogeneity of the samples in the other research papers. Conclusion: The overall implant failure rate at 5 years is 1.7%. The factors affecting significantly the survival rate are: the implant diameter, its length and the anatomic area. Failure ratios increase significantly when the diameter or the length of the implant decreases, and when they are placed in the posterior maxilla (up to 4.3%). The rate of peri-implantitis is 5.1%. The prosthodontic failure rate is 2.91%. The improvement in quality of life and satisfaction increases with the years.