Article citationsMore>>

Bolliger, C.T., Zellweger, J.P., Danielsson, T., van Biljon, X., Robidou, A., Westin, A., et al. (2000) Smoking reduction with oral nicotine inhalers: Double blind, randomised clinical trial of efficacy and safety. British Medical Journal, 321, 329-333. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7257.329

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Smoking reduction did not promote future smoking cessation in a general population

  AUTHORS: Charlotta Pisinger, Mette Aadahl, Ulla Toft, Torben Jørgensen

  KEYWORDS: Smoking Cessation; Smoking Reduction; Tobacco Consumption

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol.1 No.3, November 17, 2011

  ABSTRACT: Introduction: Smoking reduction (SR) has been introduced as a strategy for smokers who are unwilling or unable to quit. We wanted to investi tigate whether SR at one-year follow-up increased the probability of abstinence from smoking at three and five-year follow-up. Methods: we included a random sample from a general population, the Inter99 study, Copenhagen, Denmark. A total of 1975 participants were daily smokers (from both the intervention and the control group) with information on tobacco consumption at both baseline and one-year follow-up (year 1999 to 2001). Of these, 112 had reduced their tobacco consumption substantially, by minimum 50%, at one-year follow-up. Information on tobacco consumption and smoking status was available on 1441 and 1308 participants at three-year and five-year follow-up, respectively. Outcome was self-reported point abstinence at three and five-year follow-up. Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for confounders. Results: One out of five smokers (20.5%) had maintained their reduced tobacco consumption at five-year follow-up. About twice as many reducers as non-reducers reported that they had tried to quit since baseline (p