Article citationsMore>>
Plewa, M.J., Wagner, E.D., Muellner, M.G., Hsu, K.M. and Richardson, S.D. (2008) Comparative Mammalian Cell Toxicity of N-DBPs and C-DBPs. In: Karanfil, T., Krasner, S.W., Westerhoff, P. and Xie, Y., Eds., Occurrence, Formation, Health Effects and Control of Disinfection By-Products in Drinking Water, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 36-50.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0995.ch003
has been cited by the following article:
-
TITLE:
Disinfection By-Products Regulation: Zero ng/L Target
AUTHORS:
Djamel Ghernaout, Noureddine Elboughdiri
KEYWORDS:
COVID-19 Pandemic, Coronavirus, Hospital Wastewater, Disinfection, Chlorination, Disinfection By-Products (DBPs)
JOURNAL NAME:
Open Access Library Journal,
Vol.7 No.5,
May
19,
2020
ABSTRACT: Ten years ago, I was asked by a health agency about my opinion concerning the guidelines for drinking water quality. I suggested fixing the maximum acceptable concentration (MAC) to zero ng/L, once and for all for each pollutant. Such a proposition is founded on the fact that regularly the MAC is lowered following some considerations like 1) the lethal dose determination and toxicity studies, 2) the progress recorded in analytical methods and water treatment technologies and, 3) the technical-economic features of the country. Attaining the zero ng/L target is related to applying the best available technologies such as those used in the International Space Station. This work focuses on the hard challenges in dealing with the disinfection by-products (DBPs). This work concludes that, in terms of poisoning, unregulated products vs. regulated products, the question does not matter. DBPs formation should be absolutely avoided. Moreover, if DBPs are unwantedly produced, all of them must be securely removed from the water at the highest level as other organic matters. Finally, disinfection is killing microorganisms present in water; but, it is also killing human beings drinking water via its inherent toxic DBPs. Treating chemically water should be avoided.