Article citationsMore>>

Weiss, J.L., Malone, F.D., Vidaver, J., Ball, R.H., Nyberg, D.A., Comstock, C.H., et al. (2004) Threatened Abortion: A Risk Factor for Poor Pregnancy Outcome, a Population-Based Screening Study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 190, 745-750.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.023

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Routine Progesterone Supplementation in Threatened Abortion: Is It a Sound Practice?

  AUTHORS: Adel E. Elgergawy, Ahmed E. Abdelnaby, Shereen B. Elbohoty

  KEYWORDS: Progesterone, Threatened Abortion, Supplementation, Sound Practice

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.9 No.12, December 5, 2019

  ABSTRACT: Aim: To evaluate the benefits and hazards of routine progesterone supplementation in threatened abortion and whether it is a sound practice or not. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Tanta University in the period from January 2018 to December 2018. Eligible patients (n = 190) were randomly allocated into 2 groups: study group who will receive progesterone supplementation (prog. group) and control group who will receive no treatment (place. group). Results: No significant differences were found between both groups regarding all demographic data and pregnancy characteristics. Abortions were higher in place. group 17 (23.94%) than in prog. group 12 (16.44%) with no significant difference p value = 0.263. The incidence of preterm labour was also higher in the place. group 22 (30.99%) in comparison to the prog. group 17 (23.29%) with no significant difference p value = 0.300. Conclusion: Progesterone supplementation in threatened abortion was not beneficial although it reduced abortion and preterm labour rates.