Article citationsMore>>

Scott, M., Li, M., Barnes, P., Stavru, W., Dayan, S., Jones, C., Matthews, J., Cragle, J., Edwards, S., Rahall, N. and Nguyen, T. (2016) The Use of Smart Growth Scorecards/Assessment Tools to Advance Sustainable Land Use Practices. Institute for Public Administration.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Modeling Bicycle Conflict on Non-Motorized Paths on Suburban College Campuses

  AUTHORS: Zachary Nerwinski, Ardeshir Faghri, Mingxin Li

  KEYWORDS: Conflict, Safety, Non-Motorized Path, Cyclist Violations, Suburban College Campus

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Transportation Technologies, Vol.8 No.4, October 30, 2018

  ABSTRACT: Bicycling is an important way for college students and employees to get around campuses. With a rise in bicycling on campuses there comes a rise in bicycle collisions with pedestrians walking to and from classes and work. The literature review showed many papers involving bicycle conflict modeling but on roads with motor vehicles. While some aspects of this research can be applied to non-motorized paths, there is a lack of research strictly focusing on only bicycles and pedestrians. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by developing a model to identify locations on roads and paths (hotspots) on college campuses that are likely to have a bicycle collision and predict the likelihood of a serious bicycle crash on a non-motorized path based on the characteristics of the path. This study identifies those interactions between bicyclists and pedestrians on non-motorized paths on a suburban college campus in Newark, USA. Findings suggest that pedestrian density of a path is a major factor in the maximum speed bicyclists can achieve. The wider the path is, the higher the maximum speed is that a bicyclist can obtain. This is because a wider path width decreases the pedestrian density. The grade of the path has little effect on bicycle speeds. The results of the models were displayed on a GIS map that is visually appealing to a viewer. The paths were color coded based on their level of safety, so it is easy to observe problematic areas of the network. This technique can be applied to the entire campus network of non-motorized paths to study the whole system. This can then be used by planners and designers to identify areas that need upgrading and improve the overall safety of the non-motorized path system.