Article citationsMore>>

Garcia, M., Yeo, L., Romero, R., Haggerty, D., Giardina, I., Hassan, S.S., Chaiworapongsa, T. and Hernandez-Andrade, E. (2016) Prospective Evaluation of the Fetal Heart Using Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 47, 450-459.
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15676

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Diagnostic Accuracy of Automated Fetal Heart Echocardiography by Five Dimensional Compared to Two-Dimensional Ultrasound in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy

  AUTHORS: Rehab M. Abdelrahman, Ahmed R. M. Ramy, Amr M. Abdelhady

  KEYWORDS: Fetal Heart Echocardiography, Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography, 5DUS

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.8 No.5, May 18, 2018

  ABSTRACT: Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) method by Five-Dimensional Ultrasound in automated fetal heart examination to conventional fetal heart examination by Two-Dimensional ultrasound in second trimester pregnancy. Methods: 90 normal singleton pregnancies at the second trimester were enrolled in this prospective study. Fetal heart was examined by Two-Dimensional Ultrasound (2D US) and Five-Dimensional Ultrasound (FINE). Paired numerical data were compared using the paired samples t test. Inter-method agreement for the rating of the quality of cardiac views by 2D US or 5D US was assessed by calculation of the prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa coefficient (PABAK). Results: There was no statistical significant difference between fetal heart echocardiography assessment using 2DUS or 5DUS(FINE) (p-value > 0.05). The overall inter-method agreement between 2D US and 5D US was 0.92. The difference in % of satisfactory views between 2D and 5D US was 1.73%, (95% CI - 0.5% to 3.33%) (P-value = 0.144). Conclusion: Our findings indicate the accuracy of 5DUS (FINE) echocardiography in evaluation of normal heart in the second trimester of pregnancy.