Article citationsMore>>

Sandoval, J.A., Lucero, J., Oetzel, J., Avila, M., Belone, L., Mau, M., Pearson, C., Tafoya, G., Duran, B., Rios, L.I. and Wallerstein, N. (2011) Process and Outcome Constructs for Evaluating Community-Based Participatory Research Projects: A Matrix of Existing Measures. Health Education Research, 27, 680-690.
https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyr087

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Collaborative Evaluation for the Utah All Payer Claims Database Capacity Enhancement

  AUTHORS: Jennifer H. Garvin, Jonathan H. Cardwell, Kristina Doing-Harris, Dan Bolton, Laverne A. Snow, Charles W. Hawley, Wu Xu

  KEYWORDS: All Payers Claims Database, Evaluation, HIT, Informatics, Public Health

  JOURNAL NAME: Technology and Investment, Vol.9 No.2, April 4, 2018

  ABSTRACT: We present a process to evaluate the continuing development of All Payer Claims Databases (APCDs) using a collaborative evaluation process. Project teams enhanced the Utah APCD with improved analytic capacity to provide online pricing and cost-transparency reports to support health care reform in Utah. Our program evaluation efforts added key methods and tools, building on recommendations in the APCD Development Manual to provide evaluation data facilitating improvements [1]. These additions included a Collaborative Evaluation Model, logic models, and development and use of best practices as measures. Stakeholders found that the added use of best practices, logic models, and frequent feedback to practitioners facilitated the project’s success. Since the Collaborative Evaluation Model served a structural purpose, it was transparent to the project teams.