Article citationsMore>>

Dai, J., Yao, M., Qiao, S.B., Yang, Y.J., Qin, X.W., An, X.G., Hou, Y. and Liu, H.B. (2004) An Analyzing the Causes of Procedural Failure and Complications of Coronary Angiography through Right Radial Approach. Chin Circ, 19, 175-177.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: An Extremely Effective and Safe Approach of Guiding Catheter Crossing over Spasmodic Radial or (and) Brachial Artery in Patients Whose Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Was Undergone via Radial Artery Access

  AUTHORS: Zhuhua Ni, Lefeng Wang, Xinchun Yang, Junping Deng, Jianhong Zhao, Jiqiang Zhang, Shuying Qi, Tao Zhang, Yong Li

  KEYWORDS: Trans-Radial PCI, Radial or (and) Brachial Artery Spasm, Guiding Catheter Crossover of Spasmodic Segment, Guiding Wire and Balloon Assistance

  JOURNAL NAME: World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol.8 No.2, February 24, 2018

  ABSTRACT: Objective: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via the radial artery access has more advantages than that of femoral artery access, while radial or (and) brachial artery have tendency to be spasmodic. We sought to investigate the effectiveness and safety of guiding catheter crossing over spasmodic radial or (and) brachial artery segments by the aid of PCI wire and balloon compared with traditional anti-spasmodic approach. Methods: The clinical data of 168 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) (group A), whose PCI was performed via radial artery access with radial or (and) brachial artery spasm or (and) dissection and guiding catheter passing through spasmodic segments successfully by the aid of PCI guiding wire and balloon were analyzed retrospectively, simultaneously, the other 73 patients (group B) who used conventional approach to cross over the spasmodic radial or (and) brachial artery segments were treated as the control. The success rate, the time consumption and the complication were compared between the two groups. Findings: There was no significant difference in the spasmodic site between the two groups (all p value > 0.05). The success rate in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (168(100%) vs 28 (38.4%), p (4.2%) vs 14 (19.2%), p Conclusions: It is more effective and safer for guiding catheter crossing over spasmodic or (and) dissected radial or (and) brachial artery segments by the aid of PCI guiding wire and balloon than using the routine approach of administration of anti-spasm drugs for trans-radial PCI.