Article citationsMore>>

Van der Jagt, L.H. and Jansonius, N.M. (2005) Three Portable Tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, Compared with Each Other and with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 25, 429-435.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00318.x

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Rebound Tonometry in Cataract Surgery: Comparison with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

  AUTHORS: Chiara De Giacinto, Rossella D’Aloisio, Sara Trovarelli, Agostino Accardo, Odilla Vattovani, Daniele Tognetto

  KEYWORDS: Applanation Tonometer, Cataract Surgery, Intraocular Pressure, Pachymetry, Rebound Tonometer

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol.8 No.1, January 8, 2018

  ABSTRACT: Purpose: to compare the rebound tonometer ICare® (RT) with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in cataract surgery and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements. Design: retrospective, comparative study. Methods: a total of 472 patients underwent IOP measurement using RT (time 0 = RTa). GAT IOP measurement was performed 5 minutes later, followed by a second RT IOP measurement after other 5 minutes (RTa + 10 min = RTb). CCT was obtained by ultrasound pachymetry. In 106 patients IOP was measured by means of RT and GAT before clear corneal cataract surgery (RT1 and GAT1) and at one day postoperatively (RT2 and GAT2). Results: RT IOP values > 5 mmHg were overestimated, while RT IOP values Conclusion: our results showed a good agreement between measurements obtained with RT and GAT in pre and postoperative cataract surgery, although a significant statistically difference was found between RT and GAT measurements performed postoperatively. Moreover, CCT is a parameter to be considered for the IOP measurement, especially for values obtained with RT.