Article citationsMore>>

Hoffmann, M.H., Shi, H., Schmitz, B.L., Schmid, F.T., Lieberknecht, M., Schulze, R., Ludwing, B., Kroschel, U., Jahnke, N., Haerer, W., Brambs, H.J. and Aschoff, A.J. (2005) Noninvasive Coronary Angiography with Multi-Slice Computed Tomography. JAMA, 293, 2471-2478.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.20.2471

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Myocardial Segmentation of Area at Risk Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Voronoi Diagram in Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging

  AUTHORS: Naoki Fukuyama, Teruhito Kido, Akira Kurata, Yuki Tanabe, Tomoyuki Kido, Takahiro Yokoi, Ryo Ogawa, Hikaru Nishiyama, Teruyoshi Uetani, Teruhito Mochizuki

  KEYWORDS: Computed Tomography, Ischemia, Myocardial Area at Risk

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Radiology, Vol.7 No.1, March 1, 2017

  ABSTRACT: Purpose: To assess the clinical feasibility of automated segmentation of the myocardial area at risk (MAAR) using coronary computed tomography angiography (CT-MAAR), as compared to stress magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (MR-MPI). Materials and Methods: Thirty patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and stress MR-MPI were retrospectively evaluated. The myocardial territory of the left ventricle (LV) distal to coronary artery stenosis (≥50% or ≥70% stenosis on coronary CTA) was three-dimensionally quantified using a Voronoi diagram. The ratio of all stenosis-related territories to the LV volume was defined as CT-MAAR (%-LV volume). The proportion of segments with perfusion defects in stress MR-MPI to the total of 16 segments (range: 0% - 100%; with a 6.3%-interval scale) was defined as the reference. Correlation was assessed using Spearman’s test. The capability of CT-MAAR to predict the ischemic burden was assessed. Results: Stress MR-MPI depicted a median ischemic burden of 25.2% (range: 18.9% - 44.1%) in 30 patients without myocardial infarction. When CTA stenosis criteria of ≥50% (n = 30) and ≥70% (n = 27) were applied to estimate CT-MAAR, the median CT-MAAR values were 48.2% (31.6% - 64.3%) and 32.5% (23.7% - 51.9%), respectively. The correlations between the CT-MAAR values and the MR-based ischemic burden were significant (0.73 and 0.97 for ≥50% and ≥70% stenosis, respectively). CT-MAAR predicted the MR-based ischemic burden within ±1 segment of %-LV (6.3%) in 40% (12/30) of patients with ≥50% stenosis, and in 81.5% (22/27) of patients with ≥70% stenosis. Conclusions: Comprehensive assessment of resting coronary CTA combined with Voronoi diagram-based myocardial segmentation may help predict the myocardial ischemic burden in patients with severe coronary CTA stenosis.