Article citationsMore>>

Yi, J.H., Zhao, F.Q., Xu, S.Y., Zhang, L.Y., Gao, H.X. and Hu, R.Z. (2009) Effects of Pressure and TEGDN Content on Decomposition Reaction Mechanism and Kinetics of DB Gun Propellant Containing the Mixed Ester of TEGDN and NG. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 165, 853-859.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.107

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Comparison between Glass and Stainless-Steel Vessels in Differential Scanning Calorimetry Estimation

  AUTHORS: Miyako Akiyoshi, Ken Okada, Shu Usuba, Takehiro Matsunaga

  KEYWORDS: Differential Scanning Calorimetry, Glass Vessel, Stainless-Steel Vessel, Exothermic Decomposition Energy, United Nations Recommendations

  JOURNAL NAME: American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, Vol.8 No.1, January 4, 2017

  ABSTRACT: Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) provides easy screening for thermal hazard evaluation. Here, we investigate the difference between using glass and stainless-steel vessels on the DSC measurement of exothermic decomposition energy (QDSC) for 41 chemical substances (containing nitro, halogen, peroxide, and sulfur groups, and hydrazine bonds). Two borosilicate glass vessels (capillary and ampule) and one stainless-steel vessel were used. All QDSC values obtained were investigated with reference to the permissible fluctuation range specified by the ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) international Both glass vessels produced very similar QDSC values, despite different sample scales. The QDSC values obtained with the glass vessels were generally roughly within the variation tolerance range of the stainless-steel vessel. Notable exceptions were halogen- or sulfur-containing compounds; these exhibited smaller QDSC values with glass vessels in almost all cases. We will investigate whether certain structures in compounds react with stainless steel. The vessel material choice is crucial in evaluating the true reactivity of a substance.