Article citationsMore>>

Shah, B., Burdowski, J., Guo Y., de Villa, B.V., Huynh, A., Farid, M., Maini, M., Serrano-Gomez, C., Cezar, A.F., Staniloae, S., Attubato, M., Feit, F., Slater, J. and Coppola, J. (2015) Effect of Left versus Right Radial Artery Approach to Coronary Angiography on Radiation Exposure in Patients with Predictors of Transradial Artery Access Failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 66, B172-B172.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.438

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Left Radial Approach versus Right Radial Approach of Coronary Angiography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease

  AUTHORS: Pasupati Rajoria, Chenghong Xu, Yunfeng Zhang, Wenjun Guan, Hua Yang, Keping Yang

  KEYWORDS: Left Radial Approach, Right Radial Approach, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Heart Disease, Tiger Catheter

  JOURNAL NAME: World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol.6 No.8, August 19, 2016

  ABSTRACT: Background: Transradial coronary angiography has established itself as safe alternative to transfemoral approach. Today, the artery of approach lies completely on the operator’s choice. The Right Radial Approach (RRA) has been a favorite for most of the interventional cardiologists due to the convenience in operating from the right side. The Left Radial Approach (LRA) has always been a neglected route. LRA does have many advantages over the right, the vascular anatomy being one of them. The aim of our study was to compare the right radial approach of diagnostic coronary angiography with left radial approach. Method: A total of 70 cases of Coronary Angiography (CAG) with normal Allen test and satisfying the inclusion criteria were prospectively observed and studied after randomly assigning them into two equal groups, LRA (Left Radial Approach) n = 35 and RRA (Right Radial Approach) n = 35. Multipurpose TIG (Tiger) catheter was used in both the approaches to catheterize the right as well as left coronary artery. Results: The access time, catheter manipulation time, procedure time, amount of contrast used, hospital stay, intensity of pain experienced, cost of the procedure and quality of coronary angiogram observed were statistically insignificant while the fluoroscopy time was slightly statistically significant which was independent to catheter manipulation time. Conclusions: The neglected Left Radial Approach to coronary angiography is as efficacious, safe and cost effective with reduction in arterial spasm complications when compared to the Right Radial Approach performed by multipurpose Tiger catheter.