Article citationsMore>>

Morey, L. C., Hopwood, C. J., Markowitz, J. C., Gunderson, J. G., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., Skodol, A. E. et al. (2012). Comparison of Alternative Models for Personality Disorders, II: 6-, 8- and 10-Year Follow-Up. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1705-1713.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002601

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: A Review of the Measures Designed to Assess DSM-5 Personality Disorders

  AUTHORS: Adrian Furnham, Rebecca Milner, Reece Akhtar, Filip De Fruyt

  KEYWORDS: Personality Disorders, Personality Pathology, Measures, Questionnaires, Structured Interviews

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.5 No.14, September 30, 2014

  ABSTRACT: The definition, classification and assessment of personality disorders (PDs) have attracted considerable debate for nearly 50 years. This paper attempts a comprehensive review of the instruments to assess all, or specific, individual disorders as described in DSM-5, including structured interviews and inventories. The review should be helpful for clinicians, researchers and also industrial and organizational psychologists, to screen and assess the personality pathology spectrum from subclinical manifestations to full blown personality pathology. A decision tree helpful to choose among the different measures is also provided.