TITLE:
Automated Detection and Quantification of Prostate Cancer in Needle Biopsies by Digital Image Analysis
AUTHORS:
Vamsi Parimi, Laurie J. Eisengart, Ximing J. Yang
KEYWORDS:
Prostatic Adenocarcinoma, Needle Biopsy, Alpha-Methylacyl-CoA-Racemase, P504S, Basal Cell, Immunohistochemistry, Automated Digital Image Analysis
JOURNAL NAME:
Open Journal of Pathology,
Vol.4 No.3,
July
24,
2014
ABSTRACT: Introduction: Triple immunohistochemical (IHC) stains including
antibodies specific for alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase and basal cell markers
have been a valuable aid in accurate identification of prostate carcinoma. However,
accurate quantification of minuscule areas of prostate carcinoma in biopsy
specimens can often be a challenge. Here we assessed the diagnostic value and
quantitative use of automated digital image analysis on triple IHC stained
prostate needle biopsies. Methods: Twelve cases of prostate needle biopsy
material including 75 needle cores were stained with triple-antibody cocktail
(P504S + 34βE12 + p63). Slides were digitally scanned with the APERIO digital image
analyzer and evaluated with the GENIE pattern and color recognition digital
image analysis that we developed. A slide with known areas of adenocarcinoma,
high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), benign glands and stroma
was used as a training set for the automated digital image analysis platform.
Results: Among 75 needle biopsy cores, 19 (25.33%) contained adenocarcinoma by histology. Digital image analysis recognized
adenocarcinoma in 95% of these needle biopsies. The average area of the
needle biopsy was 7.63 mm2 and overall the average area of tumor was
0.196 mm2. The smallest area of tumor recognized by the program was
0.0022 mm2 (0.0363% of the core) and the largest was 0.62 mm2 (8.17% of the core) among needle core biopsies. False positives resulted from
areas of high grade PIN with patchy basal cells. The false negative was caused
by uneven AMACR staining in one area of adenocarcinoma. Digital recognition of
areas of interest was improved by three successive image analysis training
which increased the sensitivity and specificity from 83% and 89% to 90% and
93%, respectively. Conclusions: Digital image analysis in concert with IHC
triple staining may be useful for accurate detection and quantitative analysis
of small foci of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Defining methods to increase the
sensitivity and specificity of quantitative automated digital image analysis
will likely evolve as an area of investigation. Future automated digital
scanning and innovative pattern and color recognition technologies may open
avenues for classifying a variety of prostate lesions.