Article citationsMore>>

Faigenbaum, A.D., Bellucci, M.A., Bernieri, A, Bakker, B., Hoorens, K., (2005) Acute effects of different warm up protocols on fitness performance in children. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 19(2), 376–381.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Comparison between static and dynamic warm-up exercise regimes on lower limb muscle power

  AUTHORS: Jose Shelton, G. V. Praveen Kumar

  KEYWORDS: Static Stretching; Dynamic Stretching; Force Production; Post Activation Potentiation

  JOURNAL NAME: Health, Vol.1 No.2, September 28, 2009

  ABSTRACT: Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare static and dynamic warm-up regimes on lower limb muscle power and thereby the perform-ance of the individual. Methodology: Twenty eight (28) subjects were assigned into groups consisting of 2 members. From each group, 1 subject performed the static stretching and the other subject performed dynamic stretching as warm-up. This was followed by non-counter movement jumps on a force platform and the vertical jump heights were recorded. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and paired t-test at 0.05 alpha. Result: The results showed that dynamic stretching as warm-up causes significant increase (p=0.01) in the vertical jump height as compared to static stretching (p=0.03). Discussion: The increase in vertical jump height could be related to the increase in force pro-duction which plays an important role during the vertical jump test. On the other hand the decrease in vertical jump height following static stretching could be attributed to a decrease in the force production in the muscles. Conclusion: Dynamic warm-up increases the vertical lump height, whereas static stretching decreases the jump height of the athlete.