Article citationsMore>>

Gómez, L.R., Burgos, J., Cobos, P., Melchor, J.C., Osuna, C., Centeno Mdel, M., Larrieta, R., Fernández-Llebrez, L. and Martínez-Astorquiza, T. (2011) Oxytocin versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor after previous cesarean section: A retrospective comparative study. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 39, 397-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jpm.2011.030

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Comparative study for success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section following labor induction by two forms of vaginal dinosprostone: A pilot study

  AUTHORS: Mahmoud Fathy Hassan, Osama El-Tohamy

  KEYWORDS: Dinoprostone; Induction of Labor; Trial of Labor after Cesarean; TOLAC; Vaginal Birth after Cesarean; VBAC

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.4 No.1, January 10, 2014

  ABSTRACT: Background: Cesarean delivery has become the most common major surgical procedure in many parts of the world. Induction of labor in women with prior cesarean delivery is an alternative to mitigate the rising cesarean rates. Objectives: To compare the VBAC success rate between two vaginal forms of dinoprostone for labor induction in women with prior cesarean section. Material and Methods: A pilot study was conducted at a large Governmental Hospital, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, including 200 women with prior cesarean section and planned for labor induction. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A (n = 100) received dinoprostone 1.5 mg vaginal tablet. Group B (n = 100) received 10 mg dinoprostone sustained release vaginal pessary. Primary outcome was vaginal delivery rate. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results: The dinoprostone vaginal tablet and dinoprostone vaginal pessary had a comparable vaginal delivery rate (67% and 64%, respectively; p = 0.78). The median patient satisfaction with the birth process was superior in the dinoprostone vaginal pessary group (p = 0.04). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Both forms of dinoprostone were effective methods for labor induction in women with prior cesarean section. However, the patient satisfaction with the birth process was in favor of the dinoprostone sustained release vaginal pessary.