Article citationsMore>>
Heinemann, A.W., Kirk, P., Hastie, B.A., Semik, P., Hamilton, B.B., Linacre, J.M., Wright, B.D. and Granger, C. (1997) Relationships between disability measures and nursing effort during medical rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 143-149.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90255-0
has been cited by the following article:
-
TITLE:
Inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in solid organ transplantation: Results of a unique partnership between the rehabilitation hospital and the multi-organ transplant unit in an acute hospital
AUTHORS:
John T. Patcai, Marie P. Disotto-Monastero, Manuel Gomez, Lesley E. Adcock
KEYWORDS:
Rehabilitation; Outcomes Assessment; Transplants; Patient Readmission; Health Planning Guidelines
JOURNAL NAME:
Open Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation,
Vol.1 No.2,
November
25,
2013
ABSTRACT: Objective: To determine the outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients following inpatient rehabilitation, as a result of a unique partnership between the rehabilitation hospital and the multi-organ transplant program in an acute hospital. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Community rehabilitation hospital affiliated with a university. Participants: A cohort of 173 organ transplant patients admitted consecutively over a four-year period (2004-2008) was compared to a cohort of all rehabilitation patients (n = 9762) admitted to the same inpatient rehab facility during the same period. Interventions: Inpatient rehab program to all participants. Main Outcome Measures: Length of hospital stay, Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM) change (admission-discharge), and rate of discharges to home. Results: Outcomes were measured using components of the FIMTM instrument, admission and discharge data. Chi-square and independent two-sample t-tests were used for statistical analysis. Compared to a general rehabilitation inpatient population, transplant rehabilitation inpatients had: more immediate (TM change (8.9 vs. 20.9, p TM efficiency (1.1 vs. 1.4, p