In summary, all manuscripts submitted for publication in our journals undergo strict and comprehensive peer-review. The review process is single blind. If the manuscript is deemed appropriate for full review, it will be reviewed by a minimum of two external reviewers.
The submitted manuscripts shall be subjected to a thorough initial check, including a Plagiarism Check conducted within the Editorial Office. Leading the peer-review process shall be an Editor – usually the Editor-in-Chief or a board member of the journal, working alongside the Editorial Office. It starts with a Preliminary Review by the Editor (which is completed no later than 10 days after the manuscript submission).
Upon acceptance for full review, the Editor will collect a minimum of two review comments and prepare a decision letter based on the comments of the reviewers (to be completed within four weeks after the preliminary review). The decision letter is then forwarded to the Corresponding Author requesting an appropriate manuscript revision (to be peer-reviewed again, if necessary). The author shall subsequently receive a request to format the manuscript according to SCIRP’s template before proceeding into the typesetting and proofreading stage with the publisher. Prior to the online publication of the manuscript, the author will receive a PDF copy produced by SCIRP for checking.
Flowchart of the peer-review process
Guidelines for peer-reviewers
SCIRP Review Form
Join SCIRP's Peer-Review Program!
SCIRP is globally recognized as one of the largest academic Open Access publishers. Our multi-disciplinary journals require all manuscript submissions to undergo rigorous peer-review. Our esteemed reviewers take part in the evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to our journals. Based on the reviewer's comments, the Handling Editor, usually the Editor-in-Chief, is subsequently making a final decision concerning the manuscript's required improvement. We, at SCIRP, cordially invite you to participate in our peer-review program. Through your participation, you will support authors from around the world by supplying your valuable expertise via ideas and suggestions.
If you are interested in volunteering, kindly forward your Curriculum Vitae to [email protected] with the email subject titled 'Peer-Reviewer Application'. The procedures can be outlined as follows:
(1) Send us your CV;
(2) Become a peer-reviewer;
(3) Receive manuscripts from us, review the manuscripts, and send back your comments within 5 days.
The list of Guest Reviewers can be searched by name or research field(s).
Shu-Qing Ou
University of Texas Medical Branch, USA
Research Fields: Atomic, Molecular and Chemical Physics; Computational Chemistry; Molecular Modeling,Statistical Mechanics; Materials Sciences
Manju Pande
Mississippi Valley State University, USA
Research Fields: Agrochemistry
Monika A. Papa
Athens School of Fine Arts, Greece, Greece
Research Fields: Pedagogics, Psychology of Education, Multicultural education, Language Didactics
Claudia Ines Parellada
Culture Secretary of Paraná State, Brazil
Research Fields: Prehistoric Archaeology, Historical Archaeology, Ethnoarchaeology, Museum Studies
Freddy Patel
University of London (Former, now retired), UK
Research Fields: Forensic?Pathology & Medicine
Abani Pattanayak
SAP HANA CoE, SAP America, USA
Research Fields: In-memory Computing, Advanced Analytics, Big Data
Rajendra Pawar
Department of Chemistry, Deogiri College, Aurangabad, India
Research Fields: Organic Chemistry
Priya Pichika
CRISP Shared Services, USA
Research Fields: Healthcare Analytics, Health Informatics, Healthcare Data Interoperability, Pattern Recognition and AI in Lab Orders/Results, Pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance
Paulo Pinto
Universidade Federal do Pampa, Sao Gabriel, Brazil
Research Fields: Molecular Biology, acting on the following subjects: genomics, proteomics and molecular microbiology.
Julia Pochynok
Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University,Ukraine, Ukraine
Research Fields: Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University,Ukraine