In summary, all manuscripts submitted for publication in our journals undergo strict and comprehensive peer-review. The review process is single blind. If the manuscript is deemed appropriate for full review, it will be reviewed by a minimum of two external reviewers.
The submitted manuscripts shall be subjected to a thorough initial check, including a Plagiarism Check conducted within the Editorial Office. Leading the peer-review process shall be an Editor – usually the Editor-in-Chief or a board member of the journal, working alongside the Editorial Office. It starts with a Preliminary Review by the Editor (which is completed no later than 10 days after the manuscript submission).
Upon acceptance for full review, the Editor will collect a minimum of two review comments and prepare a decision letter based on the comments of the reviewers (to be completed within four weeks after the preliminary review). The decision letter is then forwarded to the Corresponding Author requesting an appropriate manuscript revision (to be peer-reviewed again, if necessary). The author shall subsequently receive a request to format the manuscript according to SCIRP’s template before proceeding into the typesetting and proofreading stage with the publisher. Prior to the online publication of the manuscript, the author will receive a PDF copy produced by SCIRP for checking.
Flowchart of the peer-review process
Guidelines for peer-reviewers
SCIRP Review Form
Join SCIRP's Peer-Review Program!
SCIRP is globally recognized as one of the largest academic Open Access publishers. Our multi-disciplinary journals require all manuscript submissions to undergo rigorous peer-review. Our esteemed reviewers take part in the evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to our journals. Based on the reviewer's comments, the Handling Editor, usually the Editor-in-Chief, is subsequently making a final decision concerning the manuscript's required improvement. We, at SCIRP, cordially invite you to participate in our peer-review program. Through your participation, you will support authors from around the world by supplying your valuable expertise via ideas and suggestions.
If you are interested in volunteering, kindly forward your Curriculum Vitae to [email protected] with the email subject titled 'Peer-Reviewer Application'. The procedures can be outlined as follows:
(1) Send us your CV;
(2) Become a peer-reviewer;
(3) Receive manuscripts from us, review the manuscripts, and send back your comments within 5 days.
The list of Guest Reviewers can be searched by name or research field(s).
Kenji Kakudo
Osaka Dental University, Japan
Research Fields: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Thaneshwor Kaloni
Department of Chemistry University of Manitoba, Canada
Research Fields: 2D materials and Pi-conducting polymers
Wei-Chih Kan
Chi Mei Medical Center, Chinese Taipei
Research Fields: Nephrology
Sinan Kandir
Department of Physiology, Cukurova University Ceyhan Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Turkey, Türkiye
Research Fields: Clinical Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience
M. Karthikeyan
Department of Chemistry, Kongu Engineering College, India
Research Fields: Conducting Polymer; Adsorption Photocatalysis; Chemometric Analysis; Water Quality Parameters
Kishore Reddy Katikireddy
Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, USA
Research Fields: Adult stem cells, ophthalmology
Keerat Kaur
New York Medical College, USA
Research Fields: cellular and molecular biology, pharmacology, biotechnology and bioanalytical research tools for estimating small biomolecule's cellular response, dose response and mechanisms of action.
Neal Bharat Kedia
Dept. of Orthodontics & Dento Facial Orthopedics,Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, India
Research Fields: Dento-Facial Orthopaedics
Muhammad Adil Khan
University of Peshawar, Pakistan
Research Fields: inequalities
Mostafa M. A. Khater
Department of mathematics,Mansoura University, Egypt
Research Fields: Pure mathematics,Mathematical Physics, Differential equation, Numerical solutions, Exact solutions