Explaining Perceived Inconsistencies in “Stated Preference” Valuations of Human Life

ISSN Print: 2164-5167
ISSN Online: 2164-5175
www.scirp.net/journal/ajibm
E-mail: [email protected]

Citations

"Explaining Perceived Inconsistencies in “Stated Preference” Valuations of Human Life"
written by Philip Thomas, Geoff Vaughan,
published by American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol.4 No.9, 2014

has been cited by the following article(s):

[1]	Minimum sample size for the survey measurement of a wealth-dependent parameter with the UK VPF as exemplar
	Measurement, 2020

[2]	Fallacies in criticisms of the J-value
	2019

[3]	Reply to Kasperski, Kuchinskaya and Josephson on" J-value assessment of relocation measures following the nuclear power plant accidents at Chernobyl …
	2019

[4]	Reply to Kasperski, Kuchinskaya and Josephson on “J-value assessment of relocation measures following the nuclear power plant accidents at Chernobyl and …
	Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018

[5]	Pitfalls in survey measurements of economic parameters
	Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018

[6]	Reply to Kasperski, Kuchinskaya and Josephson on “J-value assessment of relocation measures following the nuclear power plant accidents at Chernobyl …
	2018

[7]	Оценка стоимости среднестатистической человеческой жизни как индикатор социально-экономического развития регионов
	2018

[8]	What is the value of life? A review of the value of a prevented fatality used by regulators and others in the UK
	Nuclear Future, 2017

[9]	Оценка стоимости человеческой жизни: подходы и методы
	2017

[10]	What is the value of life?
	Nuclear Future, 2014