Low-Dose Misoprostol versus Vaginal-Insert Dinoprostone for At-Term Labor Induction: A Prospective Cohort Study

ISSN Print: 2160-8792
ISSN Online: 2160-8806
www.scirp.net/journal/ojog
E-mail: [email protected]

Citations

"Low-Dose Misoprostol versus Vaginal-Insert Dinoprostone for At-Term Labor Induction: A Prospective Cohort Study"
written by Laura Emilia Muñoz Saá, María Dolores Martín Ríos, María Rosario Noguero Meseguer,
published by Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.7 No.8, 2017

has been cited by the following article(s):

No relevant information.

[1]	Advances in drug-releasing vaginal rings Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 2026 DOI:10.1016/j.jddst.2025.107813

[2]	Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone vaginal insert versus low dose intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026 DOI:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262369