An Analysis on the Relative Efficiency of Furniture Enterprises in Guangdong Province Based on DEA-BCC and Clustering Method

ISSN Print: 2329-3284
ISSN Online: 2329-3292
www.scirp.net/journal/ojbm
E-mail: [email protected]

Citations

"An Analysis on the Relative Efficiency of Furniture Enterprises in Guangdong Province Based on DEA-BCC and Clustering Method"
written by Ying Ma,
published by Open Journal of Business and Management, Vol.4 No.2, 2016

has been cited by the following article(s):

[1]	Efficiency of Micro and Small Wood-Processing Enterprises in the EU—Evidence from DEA and Fractional Regression Analysis
	Forests, 2023

[2]	家具产业运营效率与国民经济产业结构耦合协调研究
	经济地理, 2022

[3]	ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ КЛАСТЕРНОГО АНАЛИЗА ДЛЯ СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЯ СТРАТЕГИЧЕСКОГО УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫМИ МЕДИЦИНСКИМИ …
	ЭФФЕКТИВНОЕ …, 2022

[4]	Efficiency of wood-processing enterprises—Evaluation based on DEA and MPI: A comparison between Slovakia and Bulgaria for the period 2014–2018
	Forests, 2021

[5]	Efficiency of Wood-Processing Enterprises—Evaluation Based on DEA and MPI: A Comparison between Slovakia and Bulgaria for the Period 2014–2018 …
	2021

[6]	ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF THE FOREST INDUSTRY IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN THE TIMES OF ECONOMIC CRISIS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR …
	2020

[7]	EFFICIENCY COMPARISON OF THE BULGARIAN FORESTRY AND FOREST BASED INDUSTRIES TO THESE IN EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES …
	INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 2019

[8]	Efficiency analysis of the Bulgarian forestry and forest-based industry: A dea approach
	CBU International …, 2019

[1]	Efficiency and productivity analysis of the secondary wood manufacturing sectors in British Columbia Forest Policy and Economics, 2026 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103812

[2]	Efficiency of Micro and Small Wood-Processing Enterprises in the EU—Evidence from DEA and Fractional Regression Analysis Forests, 2023 DOI:10.3390/f15010058

[3]	Efficiency of Wood-Processing Enterprises—Evaluation Based on DEA and MPI: A Comparison between Slovakia and Bulgaria for the Period 2014–2018 Forests, 2021 DOI:10.3390/f12081026