Paper Menu >>
Journal Menu >>
![]() Vol.2, No.6, 435-438 (2009) doi:10.4236/jbise.2009.26063 SciRes Copyright © 2009 Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/JBISE/ JBiSE Design and development of a new biomedical/open surgical instrument Zheng Li University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, USA Email: [email protected] Received 19 May 2009; revised 30 May 2009; accepted 1 June 2009. ABSTRACT This article introduces a new biomedical / open surgical instrument to assist surgeon in apply- ing surgical clips to patient’s body tissue and blood vessel during surgical processes. The new clip delivery system is designed to better the clip’s distal advance through internal clip channel, jaw guiding track, and all other transi- tion areas to keep surgical clip from accidental shooting out during clip’s distal move into jaws. Currently the clip distal move in normal surgical instrument is usually driven by compression springs and some complains of clip accidental drop-off were recorded in surgical procedures. Because higher request of dimensional toler- ance and better component surface quality are needed in case the compression springs are used as driven force, a little dimensional devia- tion or less qualified part surface produced from manufacturing processes will potentially cause surgical clip device malfunction or misfiring of the clips. It is clearly known that the jaws can seriously sever or damage patient’s blood ves- sel or body tissue if there is no clip inside the jaws due to accidental clip drop-off, when sur- geons close instrument handles. The improved internal system design in this new open surgical instrument can prevent clip from accidental drop-off because of well guided and controlled clip distal move through internal clip channel and track. Besides the operational force to fully form clip is lower than existing surgical clip de- vices due to better mechanical advantage in this new instrument design. In addition to the above, manufacturing and product cost can be de- creased since lower requirement of dimensional tolerance and surface quality of instrumental parts is allowed in this new surgical instrument design. This new instrumental prototype is build upon the analysis of computer aided modeling and simulation to prove its good mechanical advantage, feasible function, reliable perform- ance. The preliminary results of instrument fir- ing force from both computer aided modeling and prototype testing are very close to each other, and preliminary prototype testing shows no accidental clip drop-off in this new biomedi- cal / surgical clip instrument. Keywords: Blood Vessel; Body Tissue; Ligation; Computational Modeling; Mechanical Advantage 1. INTRODUCTION It is critical for surgeons to apply surgical clip instru- ment to the severed organs, blood vessels and body tis- sues to stop bleeding in surgical procedure [1,2,3]. The surgical clip instrument jaws should be put around patent blood vessel or body tissue and clips can be closed to secure the vessel and tissue to prevent them from bleed- ing when surgeon bring instrument handles together. Next surgical clip will be automatically driven into in- strument jaws through internal clip channel when sur- geons release instrument handles. The surgical devices to apply clips onto blood vessel and body tissue have been developed for many years [4, 5,6]. It includes single clip and multiple clip applications [7,8,9]. Next clip can be loaded into instrument after firing each clip in single clip applications and multiple clips can be sequentially applied to the vessel or tissue in multiple clip applications. The surgical clip devices usu- ally have two handles, a master body, a clip loading and crimping assembly, clip driving mechanism and some other functioning components such as clip pusher and jaws. The improvement for better clip advancement and lower cost instrument is continued to develop more reli- able, better functional and cost-effective clip instruments to support surgeons in their surgical processes. Some complains were previously recorded from clinic fields showing several incidents of accidental clip shooting out from jaws while clip was driven into jaws ![]() Z. Li / J. Biomedical Science and Engineering 2 (2009) 435-438 SciRes Copyright © 2009 http://www.scirp.org/journal/JBISE/ 436 Openly accessible at in clip instruments using compression springs as driving force. These incidents showed that the closed jaws will potentially sever or damage blood vessel or body tissue if there is no clip in jaws. The accidental clip drop-off is mainly caused by improper control of dimensional tol- erance when manufacture the instrumental components. The surgical instruments in which surgical clips were driven by compression spring require higher dimensional tolerance control and better surface quality during com- ponent manufacturing and this will lead a low volume and high cost instrumental production, otherwise the clips will drop-off or shooting out if dimensional toler- ance are too loose or clips will jam or not move by spring force if dimensions are too tight. This new instrument design has different clip delivery system compared with current clip instruments. The dis- tal movement of clip pusher driven by instrument han- dles gradually advances clip from clip magazine, through clip channel and transition area between clip channel and jaws, and finally form clip after clip being driven into guide track in jaws. The clip pusher returns proximally to its original start position when surgeons release instrument handles and then readily picks up next clip. Since the internal clip delivery can be easily and well controlled through simple lever-linkage driving system in this new design, the accurate dimensional tol- erance control and higher surface quality are not re- quired during production and manufacturing processes of instrumental components. This can lead cost-effective machining process, increase production volume, and reduce production cost. The preliminary prototype test- ing also indicates that there is no accidental clip shooting out in this new instrument design and operational force to fully form clip is lower than current surgical clip in- struments. This new instrumental prototype testing has been conducted on dogs including vascular occlusion, ligating for tubular ducts, and applying surgical clip to animal tissue. In vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to investigate the clip holding force, degradation rate, and tissue reactivity for clips of titanium material. The clips were applied across excised canine cystic ducts by this new instrument and both axial and transverse pull-off forces have been recorded and measured. In the next phase, the titanium clips were implanted subcutaneously into the animals and the remaining strength within the clips has been measured after 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, or 21 days. The preliminary results show that the clips applied by this new surgical instrument function properly. The preliminary testing results also indicated that there is no clip shooting out in this surgical instrument design and the operating force to fully form the clip is between 3.16 lbf and 3.30 lbf which are lower than 4 lbf in existing surgical instrument. 2. ANALYSIS OF NEW SURGICAL CLIP INSTRUMENT The prototype, instrument front and rear portion views of this new surgical instrument are indicated in Figure 1-3. First the instrument will be put around patient blood vessel or body tissue. When surgeons start and gradually close instrument handles, clip driven by clip pusher ad- vances distally from clip magazine through internal track and channel into jaws and finally secured blood vessel or body tissue. The instrument jaws can be open as sur- geons release instrument handles, and clip pusher and driving bar return to its original start positions. Com- pared with current instrument that clip delivery is driven by compression spring, the clip being loaded into jaws is well guided and controlled in this new instrument design. The driving bar linked to instrument handles at pivot point moves distally to drive clip pusher that advances clip steadily into jaws as surgeons gradually close surgi- cal instrument handles. Such a stable clip linear motion in this new design can be easily and well controlled by surgeons to prevent clip from accidentally shooting out from instrument. The preliminary prototype testing of Figure 1. Prototype of new surgical instrument. Figure 2. Front portion view of new surgical instrument. ![]() Z. Li / J. Biomedical Science and Engineering 2 (2009) 435-438 SciRes Copyright © 2009 http://www.scirp.org/journal/JBISE/ 437 Openly accessible at Figure 3. Rear portion view of new surgical instrument. Figure 4. Force analysis diagram in instrument. this new design indicated its proper and reliable per- formances with no clip shooting out and lower opera- tional force than usual to form surgical clips. 3. COMPUTATIONAL MODELING AND ANALYSIS Referring Figure 4, the energy balance and force equa- tions in this new surgical instrument design can be de- rived as follows. Fload * Vlinear = T * ω (1) Because torque T = Fpivot * R, T * ω = Fpivot * R * ω = Fpivot * Vangular (2) Then Fload * Vlinear = Fpivot * Vangular (3) Fload = (Vangular / Vlinear ) * Fpivot = (VR) * F pivot (4) Referring the force diagram of this instrument handle in Figure 4: Ffinger * L = Fpivot * R (5) The different Ffinger can be determined with different combination of L and R. The computational simulation can find the optimized values of L and R to reduce the operational force to fully form clip. The computer aided solution suggested L = 4.85 inch and R = 2.20 inch for best instrument performance. Based on Eq.5, Ffinger * 4.85 = Fpivot * 2.20 Fpivot = 2.20 * Ffinger Referring Eq.4, Fload = (VR) * Fpivot = (VR) * 2.20 * Ffinger (6) The velocity ratio of (Vangular / Vlinear) can be deter- mined by computer aided simulation targeting optimized instrument performance, and simulation results are shown in Figure 5. The mechanical advantage of this new instrument can be found when surgical clip is fully formed: Mechanical advantage = (VR) * 2.20 (7) = (.04940 / .03548) * .20 = 3.063 This result shows that, if 20 lbf forces are required to fully form the surgical clip, the operational force that surgeon needed is 3.265 lbf that is lower than normal spec of 4 lbf and this will benefit surgeons in their sur- gical procedure. Also, both computational simulation and prototype testing results are very close which verify and prove the credibility of this new instrument design and research methodology. 4. CONCLUSIONS The prototype of this new surgical clip instrument has been proved to have feasible function and better per- formance based on instrumental functional study, com- puter aided modeling and solution, and preliminary pro- totype testing. This new instrument design has several Figure 5. Linear and angular velocity vs. time phase in op- erating the instrument. ![]() Z. Li / J. Biomedical Science and Engineering 2 (2009) 435-438 SciRes Copyright © 2009 http://www.scirp.org/journal/JBISE/ 438 [2] D. Chan, J. Bishoff, I. Ratner, L. Kavoussi, and T. Jarrett, (2000) Endovascular gastrointestinal stapler device mal- function during laparoscopic nephrectomy: Early recog- nition and management, Journal of Urology, 164(2), 319–321 major advantages compared with some current surgical clip devices including: the clip’s distal move can be properly guided and controlled to prevent patient’s blood vessel and body tissue from damage that caused by ac- cidental clip shooting out during surgical processes, op- erational force to form clip is lower than usual surgical clip instruments, instrument production and product cost can be decreased since loose dimensional tolerance and low surface quality of instrumental components are al- lowed in this new design. The prototype testing has been conducted in lab and the preliminary result has shown the potential improvement over some current instru- ments including reliable performance without accidental clip drop-off, reduced operational force to form clip, and lower product cost. While the prototype this new in- strument is being sent to fields for more clinical trials and evaluations, further analysis and improvement will be conducted including adding support to enhance jaw pair structure to prevent jaws from twisting when unex- pected torque load exerted to the instrument due to im- proper usage in surgical procedure, adding enhancing structure to prevent jaws from accidental close when unanticipated side load exerted to instrument jaws, sim- plifying the instrument design to further reduce the product cost. [3] J. Hermiller, C. Simonton, T. Hinohara, and D. Lee, (2005) Clinical experience with a circumferential clip- based vascular closure device in diagnostic catheteriza- tion, Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 17, 154–157. [4] J. Piatt, B. Starly, E. Faerber, and W. Sun, (2006) Appli- cation of computer-aided design methods in craniofacial reconstructive surgery using a commercial image-guid- ance system, Journal of Neurosurgery, 104(1 Suppl), 64–67. [5] A. W. Cheng, P. W. Chiu, P. C. Chan, and S. H. Lam, (2004) Endoscopic hemostasis for bleeding gastric strormal tumors by application of hemoclip, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 14, 169–171. [6] B. Starly, Z. Fang, W. Sun, and W. Regli, (2005) Three-dimensional reconstruction for medical-CAD modeling, Journal of Computer-Aided Design and Ap- plication, 2(1–4), 431–438. [7] P. Evans, B. Starly, and W. Sun, (2006) Computer-aided tissue engineering for design and evaluation of lumbar- spine arthroplasty, Journal of Computer-Aided Design and Application, 3(6), 771–778. [8] W. Sun, B. Starly, J. Nam, and A. Darling, (2005) Bio-CAD modeling and its application in computer-aided tissue engineering, Computer-Aided Design, 37(11), 1097–1114. REFERENCES [9] F. C. Chu and B. C. Chang, (2005) Automatic visual tracking control system using embedded computers, Proceeding of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, July 10–12, 2005. [1] H. J. Lin, W. C. Lo, Y. C. Cheng, and C. L. Peng, (2007) Endoscopic hemoclip versus triclip placement in patients with high risk peptic ulcer bleeding, Journal of Gastro- enterol, 102, 539–543. Openly accessible at APPENDIX Nomenclature Ffinger – lbf, load on surgeon’s finger T – inch-lbf, torque on pivot point of handle Vlinear – inch per second, linear distal moving velocity of instrument drive bar Fload – lbf, force required to close jaws to form clip L – inch, distance between handle pivot point and sur- geon’s finger position (VR) – velocity ratio R – inch, distance between handle pivot and linkage pivot Fpivot – lbf, load on linkage pivot ω – degree per second, angular speed of handle at pivot point |





