Paper Menu >>
Journal Menu >>
![]() Vol.3, No.8, 490-497 (2011) doi:10.4236/health.2011.38081 Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/ Health Life style of patient before and after diagnosis of hypertension in Kathmandu Radha Achary a1, Hom Nath Chalise2* 1Department of Nursing, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Kavre; 2Department of Public Health, Asian College for Advance Studies, Satdobato, Lalitpur; *Cor responding Author: [email protected] Received 20 April 2011; revised 30 May 2011; accepted 18 June 2011. ABSTRACT Hypertension is an important public health- challenge in the developing and the developed world alike. However, hospital-based studies on cardiovascular diseases including hypertension in a developing country like Nepal have been limited. Objective: The objective of the present study w as to determine the life style of patients before and after diagnosis of hypertension. Me- thods: A total of 100 adult hypertensive pa- tients over 30 years of age who were attending in medical out patients department within 6 month to 2 years after first diagnosis of hyper- tension in Shahid Gangalal National Heart Cen- tre and Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, in Kathmandu, Nepal, in April 2009, were in- cluded using a descriptive research design. The data was collected by interview using a ques- tionnaire consisting of a combination of struc- tured and semi- structured questions. The data was analyzed by using SPSS 11.5 version. Re- sults: This study found the respondents’ knowledge regarding hypertension was poor. Regarding life style of hypertensive patients, majorities (90%) of them were non-vegetarian before diagnosis but after diagnosis of hyper- tension the percentage of non-vegetarian was reduced by 10%. Similarly, the reduction in consumption of meat, eggs, ghee and oil (mus- tard, sunflower) by hyperten- sive patients was statistically significant dif- ference (p = 0.000) after the diagnosis of hypertension. Regarding soya- bean oil consumption, additional salty food and amount of salt intake there was no statistical significant difference before and after the diagnosis of hypertension. Likewise, physical exercise and str ess red ucti on a ctiv ities performed by hypertensive patients and change in drinking alcohol and smoking was found to be statistically significant difference (p = 0.000) after the diagnosis of hypertension. Conclusion: The adverse consequences of hypertension can be reduced by modifying the life sty le. Therefore more focus should be given in increasing the awareness about hypertension by developing information, education and communication ma- terials on hypertension and setting up hyper- tensive counseling clinic in each hospitals. Keywords: Hypertension; Lifestyle; Hypertensive Patient; Nepal 1. INTRODUCTION About a quarter of the world’s population have been estimated to have hypertension at the turn of the millen- nium. It has remained an important public health chal- lenge in the developing and the developed world alike. The burden of chronic conditions such as hypertension has been likened to an iceberg phenomenon in which the cases that we see are only a part of the whole problem. Even within the ‘visible’ portion, there are different strata of hypertension with or without controlled blood pressure [1]. Hypertension has become one of the very common diseases in the modern society. It is the result of the mental tension and steeping into th e highly sophisticated life style of the so-called modern society. Besides that lack of knowledge of the people on their food habit or diet intake has also played crucial role on the expansion of the disease. Likewise, increasing pace of urbanization and industrialization of the developing countries has contributed significant impact on accelerating the dis- ease. It can be assumed that there is highly positive cor- relation between increased number of hypertension and the pace of modernization [1]. Hypertension is a major health burden and the leading cause of death in the world. Although hypertension is more common in economically developed countries than ![]() R. Acharya et al. / Health 3 (2011) 490-497 Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/ 491 in economically developing ones, it is a greater popu- lation burden in the latter because of the much larger population. WHO estimated about 62% of cardiovascu- lar disease and 49% of ischemic heart disease burden worldwide. Hypertension is estimated to cause 7.1 mil- lion deaths annually accounting for 13% of all deaths globally. Overall 26.4% adult world population was esti- mated to have hypertension in the year 2000, a number that was projected to increase to 29.2% by 2025 [2]. Certain life style habits, including unhealthy dietary habits, cigarette smoking and inactivity are risk factors for cardiovascular disease that in part may be mediated through effects on blood pressure and body weight. These life style factors may also be established during childhood and adolescence, however, their associations with weight status and blood pressure in childhood and adolescence are less clear than in adulthood [3]. The main objective of this study was to know what is the awareness of hypertensive patient about their disease and life style of patient before and after diagnosis of hypertension. 2. METHODOLOGY This is a cross-sectional study. A face to face inter- view survey method using structured questionnaire was adopted for this survey. 3. STUDY SITE AND STUDY POPULATION This study was co nducted in 2008 in 100 hyp erten sive patients above 30 years of age in two hospitals namely Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre and Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH) in Kathmandu. Respondents for this study were patients who were hy- pertensive since 6 month to 2 years (diagnosed cases of hypertension) and they were under the treatment regi- men and who were attended in medical outpatient de- partment and follow up treatment of hypertension in the above two hospitals. The patients were selected from OPD card and according to Diagnosis (isolated hyper- tension) by the Doctor. Patients having associated disease like Heart disease, Kidney disease, Diabetes etc. were excluded. The study was conducted over a month period from first August to first September, 200 8. Purposively 100 respondents were taken as sample for this study. Among 100 patients, 15 patients were taken from those who attended TUTH (From 065/4/12 to 065/4/16 Bikram Sambat Nepali Calendar) and 85 from SGNHC (From 065/4/17 to 065/5/6 Bikram Sambat Nepali Calendar). Only few patients were taken from TUTH due to lesser number of hypertensive patients attending this hospital. For the selection of respondents, Out Patient Department files of the hypertensive patients were analyzed. And th e first hundred patients whose file met the requirement were taken as the sample. All the patients meeting the criteria were interviewed on first come first basis till 100 samples were met. 3.1. Ethical Consideration The study was conducted after receiving approval from the Thesis Committee of Maharajgunj Nursing Campus, Tribhuvan University. Before we started our study a written permission was obtained from the con- cerned authorities of the selected hospitals fo r this study. The study respondents were adequately informed and explained about the purposes of the study. They were assured of the privacy and confidentiality of the infor- mation. So, verbal informed consent was obtained before a respondent was interviewed which is qu ite commo n in previous stu dy t oo [ 4, 5] . 3.2. Data Analysis SPSS 11.5 version soft ware was used to analyze the data. First, distribution in the form of frequencies and percentages, and measures of central tendency for all independent and dependent variable were reviewed. Chi- square test was done to compare the life style modi- fication before and after diagnosis of hypertension and p-value < 0.05 was considered as significant. 4. RESULTS Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of the study population. Age distribution of the respon- dents shows that age ranged from 31 years to 76 years with mean (SD) age 51.26 (0.78). Similarly, 57% were male and 43% were female. According to the location of the respondents, 64% were urban and 36% were from rural area. Among the four religious groups, 80% re- spondents were Hindus. Similarly in the ethnic composi- tion of the respondents, 32% were Newars, 30% Brah- mins, 15% Mongolian and 7% Terai cast. In the educa- tional level, 31% were illiterate, 79% were literate among them 35% had higher secondary and above education status. As per the occupational distribution of the re- spondents, 42% fr om house hold work secto r, 25% fro m service sector, 17% from business and 16% were from the agriculture sector. Economic status of respondents was measured on the basis of food sufficiency to eat. 10% respondents do not have sufficient food for a year, 60% have sufficient for a year and 30% respondents have some saving also. Duration of Hypertension shows that majority of the respond ents were suffering from one to two year and 20% were suffering from six to one year. ![]() R. Acharya et al. / Health 3 (2011) 490-497 Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/ 492 Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the hypertensive patients (n = 100). Variables Number Percent Age Group 31 - 40 18 18 41 - 50 34 34 51 - 60 25 25 Above 60 23 23 Mean age 51.26 (minimum 31 maximum 76) Sex Male 57 57 Female 43 43 Marital Status Unmarried 2 2 Married 91 91 Widow 7 7 Residence VDC 36 36 Municipality 64 64 Religion Hindu 80 80 Buddhist 14 14 Christian 4 4 Kirant 2 2 Ethnicity Brahmin 30 31 Chhetri 16 16 Newar 32 32 Mongolian 15 15 Teraicastes(Shah, Gup- ta, Chaudhary) 7 7 Educational Status Illiterate 31 31 Literate(Non formal education) 10 10 Primary 8 8 Secondary 16 16 Higher secondary and above 35 35 Occupation Agriculture 16 16 Business 17 17 Service 25 25 House hold work 42 42 Economic Status Not sufficie nt to eat for 1 year 10 10 Sufficient to eat for 1 Year 60 60 Extra saving 30 30 Family Type Nuclear 53 53 Joint 31 31 Extended 16 16 Duration of Hypertension 6 month - 1 years 20 20 1 year - 2 years 80 80 The respondents were asked about hypertension but they have poor kno wledge regarding its causes, sign and symptoms, control measure and complications. Among the total respondents 31% answered excessive salt and fat intake as the factors leading to disease occurrence followed by stress/tension (24%), smoking/alcohol (10%) and five percent answered over weight and heredity (Table 2). Further 55% respondents answered main symptoms of hypertension was dizziness (55%) followed by Headache (47%), Fatigue (18%), Palpitation (8%), Blurred vis io n ( 7%), and Flushing face (6% ). Out of total respondents, majority (63%) of the re- spondents reported that taking medicine can help the control of blood pressure. Similarly, 49% respondents reported taking low salt and low fat diet is to control blood pressure. Few (3%) of them reported weight re- duction can help to control the blood pressure (Table 3). Regarding the complication related with hypertension 42% respondents reported heart attack followed by pa- ralysis (26%), kidney disease (15%), stroke (10%) and blindness (5%) (Table 3). Regarding the food habit of respondents, majorities (90%) of respondents were non-vegetarian and only 10% were vegetarian before diagnosis, whereas after diagno- sis of hypertension, vegetarian were found to have in- creased from 10% to 20%, which is not shown here in the table. Table 4 shows the change in frequency of meat and eggs consumed by non-vegetarian after diagnosis of hy- pertension. Majority of respondents (81%) used to take mutton before diagnosis and it reduced to 59% after di- agnosis. After diagnosis of hypertension, daily consum- ers reduced from 17% to 5% and weekly consumers from 42 to 18 where as occasional consumers increased from 22% to 30%. Similarly pork consumers declined from 16 to 8%, chicken consumers declined from 76% Table 2. Awareness on symptoms and factors that may lead to hypertension (n = 100). Symptoms/factors Number (%) Symptoms Dizziness 55 (55) Headache 47 (47) Fatigue 18 (18) Epistaxis 2 (2) Blurred vision 7 (7) Palpitation 8 (8) Flushing face 6 (6) Disease causing factors Over weight 5 (5) Heredity 5 (5) Smoking/alcohol 10 (10) Excessive salt and fat intake 31 (31) Stress/tension 24 (24) ![]() R. Acharya et al. / Health 3 (2011) 490-497 Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/ 493 Table 3. Awareness on complication and control measure of hypertension, n = 100. Complication and awareness Number (%) Complications of Hypertension Heart attack 42 (42) Kidney disease 15 (15) Blindness 5 (5) Stroke 10 (10) Other (paraly sis) 26 (26) Control measures Reducing weight 3 (3) Low salt and low fat diet 49 (49) Stop smoking 11 (11) Regular exercise 27 (27) Reducing stress 22 (22) Taking medicine 63 (63) Table 4. Type of meat and eggs consumed by respondents (n = 90). Varia bles Frequency of consumption Chi-square p-value Type of Meat Daily Weekly Occasionally Total Mutton Before diagnosis 17 (19%) 42 (47%) 22 (24%) 81 (90%) After diagnosis 5 (6%) 18 (20%) 30 (33%) 53(59%) 0.000 Pork Before diagnosis 1 (1%) 5 (6%) 8 (9%) 14(16%) After diagnosis - 2 (3%) 5 (6%) 7(8%) 0.000 Chicken Before diagnosis 26 (29%) 38 (42%) 12 (13%) 76(84%) After diagnosis 15 (17%) 32 (36%) 21 (23%) 68(76%) 0.000 Fish Before diagnosis - 6 (7%) 16 (18%) 22(24%) After diagnosis - 5 (6%) 12 (13%) 17(19%) 0.000 Eggs Before diagnosis 35 (39%) 24 (27%) 26 (29%) 85(94%) After diagnosis 14 (16%) 25 (28%) 25 (28%) 64(71%) 0.000 to 68%, fish consumption from 22% to 17% and egg from 94% to 71%. The table also shows the frequency item consumption also declined after the diagnosis of hypertension. The change in food pattern after the diag- nosis of hypertension was statistically significant (P- value = 0.000). Table 5 shows the changing pattern of oil and ghee consumed by the respondents after diagnosis of hyper- tension. Majority (79%) of respondents used animal ghee before diagnosis. After diagnosis of hypertension daily users were found to have shifted occasional and non users. Hence, non users found increased from 21% to 67% after diagnosis. Similarly vegetable ghee users also changed from occasion to non-users after the diag- nosis of hypertension. Most of the respondents used mustard oil before di- agnosis of hypertension. After the diagnosis of hyperten- sion the daily users reduced from 76% to 41% and weekly and occasional users shifted to non users. After the diagnosis of hypertension 59% discontinued the mustard oil. The number of soybean oil consumers before diagno- ses were 18% and after diagnosis increased from 18% to 26% in daily users. Very few respondents were occa- sional users. The use of soybean oil shows insignificant association (p-value = 0.281) with change in oil consum- ption after the diagnosis of hypertension. Out of total respondents, only 5% respondents used sunflower oil daily and the number of daily user sharply increased from 5% to 29% after diagnosis of hyperten- sion. There was statistically significant increase in the consumption of sunflower oil after the diagnosis of hy- pertension. Out of total respondents, majority (54%) had taken normal (as usual) salt, 41% were found taking additional or above normal and only 5% were taking low salt be- fore diagnosis. But after diagnosis, majority (65%) had taken low salt, 33% usual and 2% had taken additional salt. The change in the amount of consumption of salt after the diagnosis was not statistically significant (p = 0.431) (Table 6). Additional salty food comprises papad, bottle pickle and potatochips/dalmoth etc. Out of total respondents, 76% were found to be using additional salty food before diagnosis and 60% still used it after the d iagnosis. There was no statistically significant difference in consumption of additional salty food after the diagnosis. Ta b l e 7 shows the smoking and alcohol consumption of respondents before and after diagnosis of hyperten- sion. Out of total respondents 44% smoked before diag- nosis and it reduced to 35% after diagnosis of hyperten- sion. There was statistically significant difference (p = 0.000) in smoking habit after the diagnosis of hyperten- sion. After diagnosis of hypertension many respondents decreased the frequency of smoking. Similarly 60% re- spondents consumed alcohol before diagnosis. Among them daily users were 33%, weekly 3% and occasional users were 24%. However, 70% respondents did not consume alcohol after the diagnosis of hypertension. Only 12% responden ts consumed alcohol daily, 4% weekly ![]() R. Acharya et al. / Health 3 (2011) 490-497 Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/ 494 Table 5. Type of ghee and oil consumed by respondents, (n = 100). Frequency of consumption Type of Ghee/Oil Daily Weekly Occasionally Non-user Chi-square p-value Ghee (animals) Before diagnosis 57 (57%) - 22 (22%) 21 (21%) After diagnosis 15 (15%) - 18 ( 18%) 67 (67%) 0.008** Ghee (vegetables) Before diagnosis 1 (1%) - 14 (14%) 85 (85%) After diagnosis - - 3 (3%) 97 (97%) 0.028* Mustard Oil Before diagnosis 76 (76%) 2 (2%) 22 (22%) 100% After diagnosis 41 (41%) - - 59 (59%) 0.013** Soyabean Oil Before diagnosis 18 (18%) - 3 (3%) 79 (79%) After diagnosis 26 (26%) - 2 (2%) 72 (72%) 0.281 Sunflower Oil Before diagnosis 5 (5%) - 1 (1%) 94 (94%) After diagnosis 29 (29%) 2 (2%) 3 (3%) 66 (66%) 0.038* Butter Before diagnosis 1 (1%) 1 (1%) 10 (10%) 88 (88%) 0.000** After diagnosis - - 3 (3%) 97 (97%) ** Significant at 0.01 level *Significant at 0.05 level. Table 6. Amount of salt taken by hypertensive respondents (n = 100). Amount of sal t intake Lo w Normal Additional Before diagnosis 5 (5%) 54 (54%) 41 (41%) After diagnosis 65 (65%) 33 (33%) 2 (2%) P-Value 0.431 Table 7. Smoking and alcohol consumption habit of respondents. Smoking and drinking Yes No P-Value Smoking Before diagnosis 44 (44%) 56 (56%) After diagnosis 35 (35%) 65 (65%) 0.000 Drinking Before diagnosis 60 (60%) 40 (40%) After diagnosis 30 (30%) 70 (70%) 0.000 and 14% were taking it occasionally. The overall trend of the alcohol intake seems notably declining over the incidence in terms of both amount and frequency of in- take although it is not shown here in detail. There was statistically significant (p = 0.000) reduction in consum- ption of alcohol before and after diagnosis of hyperten- sion. Physical exercise and stress reduction activities are important to control the hypertension. Out of total re- spondents, 23 h ad done physical exercise b efore diagno- sis of hypertension. But after diagnosis; the number in- creased from 23% to 47%. Similarly, very few 11 re- spondents had stress reduction activities before the di- agnosis of hypertension and their number increased re- markably from 11% to 39% after diagnosis of hyperten- sion. There was statistically significant (p = 0.000) in- crease in performance of physical exercises and stress reduction activities after the diagnosis of hypertension (Table 8). 5. DISCUSSION Hypertension is one of the most common disease af- fecting humans worldwide. Hypertension is the risk fac- tor for coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Thus it has become a challenge for the health ![]() R. Acharya et al. / Health 3 (2011) 490-497 Copyright © 2011 SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/Openly accessible at 495 Table 8. Physical exercises and stress reduction activity per- formed by respondents. Control measures Yes No P-Value Physical exercise Before diagnosis 23 (23%) 77 (77%) After diagnosis 47 (47%) 53 (53%) 0.000 Stress reduction activity Before diagnosis 11 (11%) 8 9 (89%) After diagnosis 39 (39%) 61 (61%) 0.015 care professionals to identify and treat this disease. This study used adult hypertensive patients above 30 yrs of age from two hospital of Kathmandu. Mean age of the respondents was 51.26 (±0.78) years. Male patients (57%) exceeded female patients. Similarly, ma- jority patients belonged to nuclear family and had suffi- cient resources to eat for a year, but majority of them had no savings. Men tend to display higher blood pressure than women, more evident in young and middle-age. This corresponds to the incidence and prevalence of hypertension in Nepal, as majority of hypertension is found to affect middle adult population. The prevalence of hypertension and the blood pressure levels increased with age in both men and women [6]. According to the location of the case, urban residents (64%) were more vulnerable to hypertension than rural residents (36%). An epidemiological study by Gupta and Sharma (2007), showed similar result with 25% urban and 10% rural subjects in India had hypertension. In developed countries prevalence of hypertension has been noted high in lower socio-economic groups whereas in societies with transitional state of economy high preva- lence of hypertension has been noted [7]. The findings of the present study also suggest that hypertensive patients are not sufficiently aware about hypertension regarding its causes, signs and symptoms, control measures and complications. Familoni (2005) studied on knowledge and awareness of hypertension among patients with systemic hypertension in Nigeria which showed inadequate knowledge of hypertension in patients with hypertension in Nigeria. Among 254 pa- tients, only one third knew that hypertension should be treated for life while 58.3% believed that antihyperten- sive drugs should b e used only when there is a symptom [8]. Sharma et al. (2006) studi ed of prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension in a suburban area of Kath- mandu, Nepal. This study showed prevalence of hyper- tension is significant in Nepal and awareness, treatment and control rates are poor [9]. Another study carried out by Dong et al. (2007) in China also showed high preva- lence of hypertension in rural adults in north east China with low rate of awareness and control [10]. The result of this study shows majority (90%) of re- spondents were non-vegetarian before diagnosis, whereas after the diagnosis of hypertension vegetarian were fou- nd to have increased from 10% to 20%. The change in food pattern after the diagnosis was statistically sig- ni- ficant (p = 0.000). Many literatures have been pub- lished supporting the usefulness of vegetarian diet for the hypertensive patients. A research study done by Lin- dhal (2006) found that vegetarian diet was extremely beneficial for h yp er t en sive patients [11]. The consumption habit of non vegetarian items such as mutton, buff, pork, chicken, fish and eggs were taken into account while co llecting the data. Th ere was a sharp reduction in the consumption of meat items after diag- nosis of hypertension. There was statistically significant decline in consumption of meat and eggs after the diag- nosis of hypertension. The study by Guba& Lincoln, 2008, The Dietary Ap- proaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet is a diet rich in fish, chicken, lean meat, low-fat dairy, fruits, vegeta- bles, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and seeds. In a high- quality randomize control trials the DASH diet lowered SBP for hypertensive patients by an average of 11 mm Hg and DBP by an average of 5.5 mm Hg compared with the control group [12]. According to study by MacGregor (2003) it was esti- mated that a reduction of 3 g/d in salt intake would lower blood pressure by 2.5/1.4 mmHg, which would reduce strokes by 12 to 14% and ischaemic heart disease by 9% to 10% and could prevent about 7,300 to 8,300 stroke deaths and 10,600 to 12,400 ischemic heart di- sease deaths in the UK per year [13]. The number of respondents drinking alcohol declined to 30% from 60%. The trend of the alcohol intake nota- bly declined over the period both in terms of amount and frequency of intake. A study (WHO, 2006) observed a consistent association between alcohol intake and high blood pressure. There was statistically significant dif- ference in consumption of alcohol before and after di- agnosis of hypertension. Out of total respondents, 44% had a habit of smoking before diagnosis. But after diag- nosis of hypertension 9% of them changed their habit. As a result the number of smokers declined to 35%. There was no statistically significant difference in num- ber of sticks used by the smoker after the diagnosis of hypertension. Physical factors have been taken as one of the associ- ated factors for the hypertension. After the diagnosis of hypertension, the number of respondents doing physical ![]() R. Acharya et al. / Health 3 (2011) 490-497 Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/ 496 exercise increased to 47% from 23%. Similar findings were also reported by Regmi (2008). He found that walking an hour per day at the rate of 4km/hour to be an effective exercise for reducing hypertension [14]. Another study (WHO, 200 6) also showed that there is an inverse relationship between an aerobic physical ac- tivities and blood pressure. Regular aerobic physical activity has been demonstrated to be beneficial both for prevention and treatment of hypertension [15]. In this study very few respondents had gone through stress re- duction activities before diagnosis but after that number increased to 39%.There was statistically significant dif- ference between change in performance of physical ex- ercises and stress reduction activities after the diagnosis of hypertension. 6. THE LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY The result of the study does not represent the whole population because it is a small scale hospital based study limited to the patients coming to TUTH and Sha- hid Gangalal National Heart Centre during the short pe- riod of data collection. The sample size also not esti- mates by calculating formula. Hence the results may not be generalized. This study was not designed randomly; hence this might possibly affect the results. There might be recall bias for questions asking about past life style (especially if diagnosed quite earlier). Regarding meat, oil/ghee and salt consumption, amount was not included in the questionnaire. Similarly time was not specified for physical exercise. 7. CONCLUSIONS From this study, the awareness of hypertensive pa- tients about their disease wa s found to be very poor. Re- garding the change in life style, there was statistically significant difference on the type of food consumption including meat, eggs, ghee and oil. However there was no significant difference in soyabean oil consumption, additional salty food and amount of salt intake after the diagnosis of hypertension. There was statistically sig- nificant difference in certain types of physical exercises as swimming/cycling and yoga but not in walking, jog- ging/jumping and meditation. Similarly, there was statis- tically significant difference in consumption of alcohol and smoking habit. Hence, it can be concluded that the awareness level of hypertensive patients is still low. The modification of life style is satisfactory for most risk factors, except for few like salt intake, additional salty food and number of sticks of cigarettes smoking. So Focus should also be given on modification of lifestyle for reducing the ad- verse consequences of hypertension. This can be done by: Mobilizing the key informants’ e.g. political leader, social workers for public awareness, Broadcasting pro- gram and information regarding hypertension, Develop- ing IEC (Information, Education and Communication) material (e.g. pamphlet, poster) which helps in prevent and control of hypertension and Setting up a hyperten- sion-counseling clinic in each hosp ital to be launched by the trained nurses. REFERENCES [1] Eliot, H.L. and Esbensen, B.A (2003) Blood pressure, life style and treatment. Journal of Hypertension, 13, 1093-1099. [2] Gupta, R. and Singh, N. (2006) Meta-analysis of preva- lence of hypertension in India. Indian Heart Journal, 10, 465-472. [3] Biel, K. (2008) Hypertension and stroke in Asia: Preva- lence, control and strategies in developing countries. Journal of Human Hypertension, 22, 441-443. [4] Chalise, H.N., Saito, T. and Kai, I. (2010) Social support and its correlation with loneliness: A cross-cultural study of Nepalese older adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 71, 115-137. doi:10.2190/AG.71.2.b [5] Chalise, H.N., Saito, T., Takahashi, M. and Kai, I. (2007) Relationship specialization amongst sources and recei- vers of social support and its correlations with loneliness and subjective well-being: A cross-sectional study of Nepalese older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 44, 299-314. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2006.07.001 [6] Sarraf-Zadegan, N., Boshtam, M., Mostafavi, S. and Rafiei, M. (1999) Prevalence of hypertension and associ- ated risk factors in Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 5, 993-1001. [7] Gupta, R. and Sharma, A.R. (2007) Prevention of hyper- tension and subtypes in an Indian Rural population: Clinical and electrocardiographic correlates. Indian He- art Journal, 8, 823-829. [8] Familoni, B. (2005) Knowledge and awareness of hyper- tensionamong patients with systemic hypertension in Nigeria. Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 21, 450-462. [9] Sharma Dewakar, K.C., et al. (2006). Study of preva- lence, awareness, and control of hypertension in a sub- urban area of Kathmandu, Nepal. Indian Heart Journal, 58, 34-37. [10] Dong, G.H. and Sun, Z.Q. (2007) Awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in rural adults of China. Jou- rnal of Hypertension Residence, 30, 951-958. doi:10.1291/hypres.30.951 [11] Lindhal, R.S. (2006) Vegetarian diet for hypertensive patient. New England Journal of Medicine, 330, 1530- 1533 [12] Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2008) Hypertension the role of diet and lifestyles. Journal of Human Hyperten- sion, 15, 235-251. [13] MacGregor, D.E. (2003) How far should salt intake be ![]() R. Acharya et al. / Health 3 (2011) 490-497 Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/HEALTH/ 497 reduced? Recommendation on dietary salt. American Journal of Medical Association, 28, 59-64. [14] Regmi, S. (2008) Detection of individuals prone to de- velop hypertension in the future life. Journal of Nepal Medical College, 10, 33-37. [15] World Health Organization (2006) Focus in priorities, WHO report, 2005. www.who.org |









