Paper Menu >>
Journal Menu >>
![]() Journal of Computer and Communications, 2013, 1, 1-4 Published Online November 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/jcc) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2013.16001 Open Access JCC 1 Comput er Pr o gr a m C alcu lation for Di s t or ti on of Wide-Band Track and Hold Amplifier Hailang Liang1,2, Jin He1,2, Xiaoan Zhu2,3, Xiaomeng He2, Cheng Wang2,3, Lin He2, Gui Liu2, Qingxing He4, Caixia Du4 1Tera-Scale Research Center, Institute of Microelectronics, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Peking Univer- sity, Beijing 100871, China; 2Peking University Shenzhen SOC Key Laboratory, PKU-HKUST Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institution, Shenzhen 518057, China; 3Dong Guan Xin Cheng Electronic Technology Ltd. Co., High-Tech Industrial Development Zone, Song- shanhu Lake, Dongguan, China; 4Shenzhen Huayue Terascale Chip Ltd. Co., Shenzhen 518045, China Email: [email protected] Received June 2013 ABSTRACT Tow different computer calculation methods for distortion of the wid e-band diode bridge track and hold amplifier (THA) are presented based on a high frequency Schottky diode model. One of the computer programs calculates the distortion of weekly nonlinear THA based on the KCL and the nonlinear-current method. The other calculates the weekly nonlin- ear distortion by using a Volterra series method and a nodal formulation. Comparative calculation results for the diode bridge THA have shown good agreement with these two computer program calculation methods, whereas the overall computational efficiency of the nonlinear-current method is better than that of the nodal formulation method in a special evaluation. Keywords: Track and Hold Amplifier; Broadband Amplifiers; High-Speed Integrated Circuits; Schottky Diode Frequency Converters; Harmonic Distortion; Volterra Analysis; Compute r Pro gram; Nonlinear-Current Method 1. Introduction A diode bridge architecture THA prior to the analog to digital converters are used to implement low-cost ultra high speed transceivers. Distortion is one of the impor- tant factors that limit the dynamic range of THA [1]. It is crucial to predict and calculate the distortion in the weakly nonlinear circuit by computer program cal- culation or simulation. Several methods used to resolve the distortion issues are shown in [2-6]. Two computer programs based on these methods are implemented to evaluate the distortion of THA with an improved proce- dure in terms of the Volterra series. In this paper, two computer program are used to cal- culate the weakly nonlin ear distortion of the diode bridge switch THA based on the high frequency Schottky diode model in terms of a Volterra-series analysis. Section 2 describes a diode bridge THA for ultra high speed appli- cation. In Section 3, the high speed diode model, assumptions and distortion analysis are presented. The computer program description is proposed in Section 4. Section 5 shows the program calculation results and then follows by concl usion. 2. A Diode Bridge THA Consider a diode bridge THA shown in Figure 1, which is directly derived from Fig ure 2 in [7], this circuit con- sists of a high-speed Schottky diode bridge ( 1 D to 4 D) used as a switch between the input and output, a hold Figure 1. A diode bridge track and hold amplifier [ 7]. ![]() Computer Program Calculation for Distortion of Wide-Band Track and Hold Amplifier Open Access JCC 2 Figure 2. Program flow chart for calculating the distortion [4,10]. capacitor H C to maintain the sampling voltage, a diffe- rential pair ( 1 Q and 2 Q ) to turn on/off the diode bridge switch, two load inductors used to extend bandwidth, two load resistors, a bootstrap buffer, a output buffer and a current tail. This THA with diode bridge configuration is suitable for wideband and high speed application [7]. 3. Model, Assumptions and Distortion Analysis As shown in [8]. A simplified equivalent circuit for the diode bridge THA in track mode is illustrated in Figure 3(a). The first order Volterra kernel )( 11 ω jH is given by the following Equation (1) [1]. K d H K d Cj r Cj Cj r jH 11 1 11 1 1 =)( ωω ω ω ++ + (1) The second order and the third Volterra kernel ),( 212 ωω jjH and ),,( 3213 ωωω jjjH are shown in Equation (2) and Equation (3) respectively. Equation (2) and Equation (3) imply that if 1=)( 11 ω jH , the Vol- terra kernels ),( 212 ωω jjH and ),,( 3213 ωωω jjjH tend to zero. )( 1 ))((1 2 =),( 21 2 11 2 212 ωω ω ωω jjC rV I jH V I jjH K dt d t d +++− −− (2) 21211 2 31 23 123 23 11111 1 3 123 (,)(() 1) ( ,,)=1() (13()3() ()) 61() d t dK td d t dK td IHj jHj V Hj jjICj Vr IHjH jHj VICj Vr ωω ω ωωω ωωω ω ωω ωωω − −−+ + +− +− + −−+ + (3) The third-order harmonic distortion HD3 is the ratio of the amplitude of the third-order harmonic to the ampli- tude of the fundamental harmonic. With the Volterra co- efficients, 3 HD is defined as followings [1,9]. (a) (b) Figure 3. A simplified equi val ent c irc uit for the di ode br idge THA. ![]() Computer Program Calculation for Distortion of Wide-Band Track and Hold Amplifier Open Access JCC 3 2 11 3213 3 |)(| |),,(| 4 1 = in V jH jjjH HD ω ωωω (4) The third-order intermodulation distortion which is the ratio of third-order kernel to the first-order kernel can be expressed as [1]. 2 3 11 3213 3 |)(| |),,(| 4 3 = in V H H IM ω ωωω (5) In term of Volterra analysis, one can choose the appro- priate values for the bias current and the hold capacitor, H C , to yield a suitable 3 IM performance [1]. 4. Computer Progr am D es crip tio n (1) Nonlinear-current method: The KCL and the nonlinear-current method are used in this program. The detailed description of the nonlinear- current method was proposed in [5,6], [4] and [10]. In this approach the small-signal I/V characteristic for a simple voltage-controlled conductance is expressed as [10]: ...= 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 21 +++++ vgvgvgvgvgi (6) where the first-order voltage )(tv is )( 2 1 =)( , = tjexpvtv qqs Q Qq ω ∑ − (7) the second-order curre nt [4 ,10] is 2 221 21, 1, 121 2 == 12 ()= () [ ()] 4 QQ qqq q q QqQ i tgvt gvvexp jt ωω −− ++ ∑∑ (8) This program is implemented in Python in terms of the nonlinear-current method and KCL [4,10]. The linear resistors, diodes, capacitors, inductors, controlled sources, transmission lines and the nonlinear resistors, diodes, capacitors, and controlled sources are used in this pro- gram for calculating the distortio n of Volterra series. The flow chart for the program is illustrated in Fig ure 2, where the basic algorithm used in this paper is depicted in [4,10]. The program first initializes the environmental vari- ables, which includes setting up the values of the re- sistors, the capacitors, the diodes, the inductors, the VCCS etc. and replacing every non-linearity with its linearized equivalence. Then the program begins to calculate the first order voltage with linearized equivalence [4]. The output data are saved and then the second and the third order currents and voltages are computed, the calculation of these higher order currents and voltage depends on those of the lower order ones that have been saved. As shown in the flow chart, the related currents and voltages are solved for each order and the desired corresponding responses are derived from the Volterra series. (2) Volte r r a series and nodal formulation method: The flow chart of this method is shown in Figure 4. More detailed description of this method is depicted in [11]. To compare with the results from those of non- linear-current method, the program has been rewritten in Python languag e . 5. Calculation Results Figure 5 illustrates the IIP3 versus input frequency re- sults of both nonlinear-current method and nodal for- mulation method, which indicates that these two results have a good agreement in the range of the input fre- quency. The results of the HD3 versus input frequency for both nonlinear-current method and nodal formulation method Figure 4. Program flow chart for the computation of vol- terra kernels [2]. ![]() Computer Program Calculation for Distortion of Wide-Band Track and Hold Amplifier Open Access JCC 4 Figure 5. Comparison of third-order inter cept point. Figure 6. HD3 characteristics of diode bridge THA. are illustrated in Figure 6, it shows that they are also similar and have the agreement between them. At some special test condition, the calculation time results of both nonlinear-current method and nodal for- mulation method are illustrated in Table 1. Obviously, the calculation times of the nonlinear-current method is much less than those of nodal formulation method with the specified input frequency. 6. Conclusion Nonlinear-current method and nodal formulation method for distortion calculation of the diode bridge configura- tion THA are presented by using a simplified high-speed diode model. Comparative results show that the cal- culation results derived by the nonlinear-current method is consistent with thos e of the nodal formulation method, whereas the overall calculation time of the nonlinear- current method has been improved. 7. Acknowledgements This work is supported by the Industry Education and Table 1. Summary of calculation time. Frequency (GHz) 1 3 5 Nonlinear-current method (Sec) 12.78 36.42 42.75 Nodal formulation method (Sec) 25.17 72.49 87.73 Research Foundation of PKU-HKUST Shenzhen-Hong- kong Institution (sgxcyhzjj201204), by the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (S2011040001822) and the Fundamental Research Project of Shenzhen Science and Technology Foundation JCYC20120618163025041 . This work is also supported by the National natural Science Funds of China (61204033, 61204043). REFERENCES [1] J. C. Jensen, “Ultra-High Speed Data Converter Building Blocks in Si/SiGe HBT Process,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego, 2005. [2] P. Wambacp and W. Sansen, “Distortion Analysis of Analog Integrated Circui ts,” 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em, Kluwer, Norwell, MA, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5003-4 [3] J. Vuolevi and T. Rahkonen, Distortion in RF Power Am- plifiers. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Artech House INC., Norwood, MA, USA, 2003. [4] D. D. Weiner and J. E. Spina, “Sinusoidal Analysis and Modeling of Weakly Nonlinear Circuits,” 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em, Van Nostrand, New York, 1980. [5] S. Maas, “Nonlinear Microwave Circuits,” 1em pl us 0.5em minus 0.4em Artech House, Norwood, MA, 1988. [6] J. Bussgang, L. Ehrman and J. Graham, “Analysis of Nonlinear Systems with Multiple Inputs,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 62, No. 8, 1974, pp. 1088-1119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1974.9572 [7] J. Jensen and L. Larson, “A Broadband 10 GHz Track- and-Hold in Si/SiGe HBT Technology,” Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2000, pp. 245-248. [8] H. Liang, R. Evans and E. Skafidas, “Distortion Analysis of Ultra Wide-Band Diode Bridge Track and Hold Am- plifier,” 53rd IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), 2010, pp. 721-724. [9] R. Minasian, “Intermodulation Distortion Analysis of MESFET Amplifiers Using the Volterra Series Repre- sentation,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1980, pp. 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1980.1129998 [10] S. Maas, “A General-Purpose Computer Program for the Volterra-Series Analysis of Nonlinear Microwave Cir- cuits,” IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Vol. 1, 1988, pp. 311-314. [11] H. Liang, J. He, C. Wang, X. Zhu and M. Chan, “A MATLAB Program for Volterra Distortion Analysis in CMOS Switched Source Follower,” IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Sy stems (APCCAS), 2012, pp. 108-111. |





