Paper Menu >>
Journal Menu >>
![]() Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2013, 1, 5-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2013.13002 Published Online August 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/jamp) On Harmonic Index and Diameter of Graphs* Jianxi Liu School of Informatics, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China Email: [email protected], [email protected] Received June 12, 2013; revised July 15, 2013; accepted August 5, 2013 Copyright © 2013 Jianxi Liu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT The harmonic index of a graph is defined as G 2 uvE G HG du dv , where denotes the degree of a vertex in . It has been found that the harmonic index correlates well with the Randi index and with the -electronic energy of benzenoid hydrocarbons. In this work, we give several relations between the harmonic index and diameter of graphs. du uGc π Keywords: Harmonic Index; Diameter 1. Introduction All graphs considered in the following will be simple. Let be a graph with vertex set and edge set . The order of graph G is the number of its vertices. The leaf of a graph is a vertex with degree one. For undefined terminology and notations we refer the reader to [1]. For a graph G, the harmonic index G VG EG H G is defined as 2. uvE G HG du dv It has been found that the harmonic index correlates well with the Randić index [2,3] and the -electronic energy of benzenoid hydrocarbons [4,5]. Favaron et al. [6] considered the relation between harmonic index and the eigenvalues of graphs. Zhong [7] found the minimum and maximum values of the harmonic index for con- nected graphs and trees, and characterized the cor- responding extremal graphs. Recently, Wu et al. [8] gave the minimum value of the Harmonic index among the graphs with the minimum degree at least two. In this work, we shall give some relations between the harmonic index and diameter of graphs. π 2. Main Results First, we shall give two sharp upper bounds of the relationship involving the harmonic index and diameter of connected graphs. In [7], Zhong gave the following result: Lemma 2.1 ([7]) Let be a graph with order , Gn then , 2 n HG where the equality holds if and only if G is a regular graph. Since the complete graph n K is a regular graph with diameter one, we have: Theorem 2.2 Let be a connected graph with order G 4n diameter DT , then 1, 22 HT nn HT DTDT where equalities hold if and only if is the complete graph G n K . An edge 12 x x is called local maximum if its weight 12 x 2 dx d is maximum in its neighborhood, i.e., 12 22 i dx dxdx du for any edge i x u for 1, 2.i Lemma 2.3 Let 12 x x be a local maximum edge in graph , then G 12 0.HGHG xx *Research supported by the National Natural Science Foundation o f China (No.11101097) and Foundation for Distinguished Young Tal- ents in HigherEducation of Guangdong, China (No.LYM11061). Proof. We have C opyright © 2013 SciRes. JAMP ![]() J. X. Liu 6 12 21 12 121 1 1 221212 12 2 12 1212 12 222 1 2222 2 ()1 11 22 2 10 11 uNx x vNx x HGHG xxdx dxdx dudx du dx dxdvdxdvdx dxdx dxdx dx dx dx dxdx dxdx dxdx dx , where denotes the vertex set adjoining to i Nx i x for . 1, 2i If 12 x x is a leaf of , i.e., at least one of G 12 , x x has degree one, we can see that it is a local maximum edge. Thus, by Lemma 2.3, Corollary 2.4 If 12 x x is a leaf in graph G, then 12 0.HGHG xx Theorem 2.5 Let T be a tree with order 4n diameter , then DT 51 , 6223 1 HT n HT DTDT n 1 where equalities hold if and only if T is a path . n P Proof. If is a path, we have T 1 26 n HT and 1DT n. It is obvious that both equalities hold. Now we assume that T is not a path, then and there are at least three pendent vertices in 2DT n T . Assume 01 D Puu u be the longest path in T . Then at least one pendent vertex, say 1, is not contained in v P . Now we start an operation on T , i.e., we continually delete pendent vertices which are not contained in P until the resulting tree is P . Assume 1 are the vertices in the order they were deleted, we have ,, k vv 1 1 1 23 k i i D HTHT vHTvHP by Corollary 2.4 and 1 1 k i i DTDT vDTvD . Thus, we have > 51515 > 62 6262 H TDTHPDP Dn n and 15 1 2626 >= > 1 Dn HT HP DT DPDn . This result seems true for any connected graph with order and we propose as a conjecture as follows: n Conjecture 2.6 Let be a connected graph with order G 4n diameter , then DG 51 , 6223 1 HG n HG DGDG n 1 . REFERENCES [1] J. A. Bondy and U. S. R. Murty, “Graph Theory,” Springer, Berlin, 2008. [2] X. Li, I. Gutman, “Mathematical Aspects of Randić-Type Molecular Structure Descriptors,” Mathematical Chemis- try Monographs No.1, University of Kragujevac, 2006. [3] X. Li and Y. T. Shi, “A Survey on the Randić Index,” Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, Vol. 59, No. 1, 2008, pp. 127-156. [4] B. Lučić, N. Trinajstić and B. Zhou, “Comparison be- tween the Sum-Connectivity Index and Product- Connec- tivity Index for Benzenoid Hydrocarbons,” Chemical Physics Letters, Vol. 475, No. 1-3, 2009, pp. 146-148. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2009.05.022 [5] B. Lučić, S. Nikolić, N. Trinajstić, B. Zhou and S. I. Turk, “Sum-Connectivity Index,” In: I. Gutman and B. Furtula, Ed., Novel Molecular Structure Descriptors-Theory and Applications I, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, 2010, pp. 101-136. [6] O. Favaron, M. Mahó and J. F. Saclé, “Some Eigenvalue Properties in Graphs (Conjectures of Graffiti-II),” Dis- crete Mathematics, Vol. 111 No. 1-3, 1993, pp. 197-220. doi:10.1016/0012-365X(93)90156-N [7] L. Zhong, “The Harmonic Index for Graphs,” Applied Mathematics Letters, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2012, pp. 561-566. doi:10.1016/j.aml.2011.09.059 [8] R. Wu, Z. Tang and H. Deng, “A Lower Bound for the Harmonic Index of a Graph with Minimum Degree at Least Two,” Filomat, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2013, pp. 51-55. Copyright © 2013 SciRes. JAMP |



